Karthick v. The State Rep By
RMT.TEEKAA RAMAN, J.
The petitioner/A1, who apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offence punishable under Sections 147,148,341,294(b), 323,324 and 506(ii) in Crime No.88 of 2022 on the file of the respondent police, seek anticipatory bail. 2.The case of the prosecution is that on 24.05.2022, due to previous enmity, the petitioner along with other accused persons, assaulted the de-facto complainant with wooden log and also abused her in filthy language. Hence the case.
3. The learned Counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner is an innocent person and he has been falsely implicated in this case. Hence, he prayed for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner.
4. The learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) for the respondent would submit that due to civil dispute, the petitioner along with other accused persons have assaulted the de-facto complainant and intimidated her. However, he opposed for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner.
5. Heard both sides and perused the materials available on record including the FIR.
6. Taking into consideration the facts and circumstances of the case and the submissions made by the learned counsel on either side, by the earlier order in Crl.O.P.No.13360 of 2023 dated 23.06.2023, the anticipatory bail was granted by this Court, but fails to execute the sureties and the petitioner shall execute the sureties on or before 18.10.2023, failing which, the anticipatory bail shall stand dismissed. Hence, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.
7. Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on his appearance, within a period of fifteen days from the date on which the order copy made ready, before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Sankarapuram, on condition that the petitioner shall execute a separate bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the respondent police or the police officer who intends to arrest or to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail shall stand dismissed and on further condition that:
[a] the petitioners and the sureties shall affix their photographs and Left Thumb Impression in the surety bond and the Magistrate may obtain a copy of their Aadhar card or Bank pass Book to ensure their identity.
[b]the petitioner shall execute the sureties on or before 18.10.2023, failing which, the anticipatory bail shall stand dismissed;
[c] the petitioners shall report before the respondent Police, everyday at 10.30 a.m., until further orders;
[d] the petitioners shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial. [e] the petitioners shall not abscond either during investigation or trial.
[f] On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioners in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioners released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560]. [g] If the accused thereafter abscond, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 229A IPC.
27.09.2023 nvi
RMT.TEEKAA RAMAN, J.
nvi 27.09.2023