Audco India Ltd. v. The Executive Officer

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 31.08.2018

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE Mr.JUSTICE V.BHARATHIDASAN W.P. 33484 of 2004 & W.M.P. 40477 of 2004 M/s.Audco India Ltd.

Rep. by its Joint General Manager ... Petitioner Vs The Executive Officer, Maraimalai Nagar Township, Maraimalai Nagar-603 209.

Kancheepuram District.

... Respondent PRAYER : Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus, forbearing the respondent from levying, demanding or collecting vacant site tax as a condition precedent for process or sanction of planning permits and approval of building permits or plans. For Petitioner : Mr.S.B.S.Raman & Associates For Respondent : Mrs.Ramya Revathy, Government Advocate,

O R D E R

The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the relief sought for in this writ petition has become infructuous and hence the writ petition may be dismissed as infructuous and he has also made an endorsement to that effect.

2. Recording the endorsement made by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, this Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous petitions are closed.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CS-VIII) // True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

rpp To The Executive Officer, Maraimalai Nagar Township, Maraimalai Nagar-603 209.

Kancheepuram District.

W.P.33484 of 2004 and W.M.P.40477 of 2004 RJ(CO) RMP(24/09/2018) https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/