← Library
Madras High CourtWP/30923/2025disposed of

Rajapartarangadurai Pappaiyan v. Superintendent Of Police

2025-08-25Honourable Mr.Justice Mohammed Shaffiq6 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 25.08.2025

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE MOHAMMED SHAFFIQ Rajapartarangadurai Pappaiyan, Additional Director, Komalam Farms Pvt. Limited, Off: B003, Sipani Bliss - 1, Bandapura, Anekal, Banglore, Karnataka - 562 106.

... Petitioner Vs.

1. The Superintendent of Police, Krishnagiri District - 635 115.

2. The Tahsildar, Taluk Office, Denkanikottai - 635 107.

3. The Inspector of Police, Denkanikottai, 635 107.

... Respondents PRAYER : Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of Writ of Mandamus, to direct the second respondent to survey the land along with the police protection in Survey Nos.342/3, 342/10, 343/5, 343/7, 344/4, 347/3, 347/4, 348/2, 348/3, 349/3, 349/6, 350/1, 350/3, 350/5, 362/1, 362/5, 363/1, 363/4, 363/5, 363/6, 363/7 & 364/3 situated at Hanumananthapuram Village, Denkanikottai Taluk, Krishnagiri

District which were lawfully purchased by the Company through various registered sale deeds from lawful vendors on the file of the Sub-Registrar, Denkanikottai, Krishnagiri District by considering the representation dated 15.05.2025 within a time stipulated period of time fixed by this Court. For Petitioner :

Mr.M.Dinesh For Respondents :

Mr.P.Sathish Addl. Govt. Pleader for R1 & R2 Mr.R.Kishore Kumar Govt. Advocate (Crl.Side) for R3

O R D E R

By consent of learned counsel on both sides, this writ petition is taken up for final disposal at the admission stage itself.

2. This writ petition has been filed seeking issuance of a writ of mandamus directing second respondent to conduct survey pursuant to the representation submitted by petitioner on 15.05.2025.

3. It is submitted by learned counsel for petitioner that petitioner submitted a representation on 15.05.2025 to respondents seeking survey of the subject property comprised in Survey Nos.342/3, 342/10, 343/5, 343/7, 344/4, 347/3, 347/4, 348/2, 348/3, 349/3, 349/6, 350/1, 350/3, 350/5, 362/1,

362/5, 363/1, 363/4, 363/5, 363/6, 363/7 & 364/3 situated at Hanumananthapuram Village, Denkanikottai Taluk, Krishnagiri District. Since the same was not considered, the present writ petition has been filed before this Court.

4. At the outset, it is submitted by Mr.P.Sathish, learned Additional Government Pleader appearing for respondents 1 & 2 that they will consider petitioner's representation and survey petitioner's land within a time frame to be fixed by this Court, which was agreed to by learned counsel for petitioner.

5. It is further submitted by learned Additional Government Pleader appearing for respondents 1 & 2 that in case Police protection is required, they would request third respondent. When this was pointed out, Mr.R.Kishore Kumar, learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side), appearing for third respondent would submit that if any such request is made, adequate Police protection will be granted.

6. In view of the limited relief that is prayed, this Court is inclined

to dispose of the writ petition with following directions: i) Second respondent shall consider the representation dated 15.05.2025 in accordance with law and conduct survey, after issuing notice to petitioner, adjacent land owner and all other interested parties including rival claimants, if any.

ii) Though facts have been set out extensively in the affidavit, this Court does not propose to deal with it, while leaving it open to second respondent to call for any document/conduct enquiry, to satisfy itself of petitioner's entitlement for requesting survey of subject property. iii) It is open to second respondent to request for Police protection before third respondent. If any such request is made, third respondent is directed to provide adequate Police protection for conducting the survey. iv) The entire process shall be completed within a period of twelve weeks from the date of uploading of web copy without waiting for the receipt of certified copy.

v) It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any view with

regard to the merits of the case and it is open to second respondent to consider the matter on its own merits and in accordance with law. Rights and contentions of petitioner and all other interested parties are left open.

7. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs.

25.08.2025 NCC: Yes / No Index : Yes / No Speaking Order : Yes / No vji To

1. The Superintendent of Police, Krishnagiri District - 635 115.

2. The Tahsildar, Taluk Office, Denkanikottai - 635 107.

3. The Inspector of Police, Denkanikottai - 635 107.

MOHAMMED SHAFFIQ, J.

vji 25.08.2025