A.Ramkumar v. The Superintendent Of Police

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 01.03.2019

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN W.P.No.9613 of 2017 A.Ramkumar

...Petitioner

-Vs1.The Superintendent of Police, Villupuram District, Villupuram.

2.The Inspector of Police, Vanur Police Station, Villpuram District.

3.Jaisankar ... Respondents PRAYER:

Writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, to directing the respondents 1 and 2 to take action on the basis of the petitioner's representation dated 10.04.2017 against the 3rd respondent in accordance with law.

For Petitioner : Mr.M.Gnanasekar For RR1 & R2 : Mr.M.Mohamed Riyaz Additional Public Prosecutor For RR3 : No Appearance

ORDER

The writ petition has been filed to direct the respondents 1 and 2 to take action on the basis of the petitioner's representation dated 10.04.2017 against the 3rd respondent in accordance with law.

2.

The petitioners seeks direction to the respondents to take action on the basis of the petitioner's representation dated 10.04.2017. Now, almost three years have been lapsed and hence, due to the lapse of period, the prayer cannot be considered now. However, the petitioner is at liberty to file a fresh representation, on fresh cause of action, if so advised. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

3.

With the above observations, this Writ Petition stands disposed of. No costs.

pds/lok Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CS IV) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar To 1.The Superintendent of Police, Villupuram District, Villupuram.

2.The Inspector of Police, Vanur Police Station, Villpuram District.

3.The Additional Public Prosecutor, High of Court, Madras.

+1cc to Mr.M.Gnanasekar, Advocate, SR.No.19860 W.P.No.9613 of 2017 Kak(08/05/2019) https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/