Narendran @ Naveen v. The State Rep. By Its

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 12.09.2024

CORAM

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.DHANABAL Narendran @ Naveen

...Petitioner

Vs.

The State rep by Its Inspector of Police E3 Teynampet Police Station, Chennai ( Crime No.269 of 2024)

...Respondent/Complainant

PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 483 of B.N.S.S. Act, 2023, praying to enlarge the petitioner on bail in Crime No.269 of 2024 on the file of respondent police. For Petitioner : Mr.G. EzhilBalaji For Respondent : Mr.S.Vinothkumar Government Advocate (Crl. Side) ***** 1/6

O R D E R

The petitioner, who was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 27.07.2024 for the offences under Sections 8(c)20(b)(ii)(B) and 29(1) of Narcotic Drugs @ Psychotropic Act, 1985 in Crime No.269 of 2024 on the file of the respondent police, seeks bail.

2. The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner is in possession of 1 kilo and 500 grams of ganja. Hence, the case.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is an innocent person, he has not committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution, and he has been falsely implicated in this case. He further submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 27.07.2024 ; that he is a law-abiding citizen; that he is ready to furnish substantial sureties for his due release on bail; and therefore, he prays for the grant of bail to the petitioner.

4. Learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) opposes the grant of 2/6

bail to the petitioner by stating that the petitioner was found in illegal possession of 1 kilo and 250 grams of ganja He further submitted that the co-accused in this case has been granted bail and there is no previous case pending against the petitioner.

5. Heard both sides and perused the materials available on record. 6.Considering the representation made on both sides and the quantity of material involved in this case, there is no previous case pending against the petitioner, the co-accused in this case has been granted bail and also taking into consideration the period of incarceration undergone by the petitioner, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner with certain conditions:

7. Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail on his executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties, each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the XVIII Metropolitan Magistrate, Saidapet, Chennai and on further conditions that:

[a] the petitioner shall report before the Principal 3/6

Special Court under EC & NDPS Act, Chennai-104 , on all working days at 10.30 a.m., until further orders, without fail. [b] the petitioner shall attend in accordance with the conditions of the bond;

[c] the Petitioner shall not commit any offences of similar to the offence of which he is accused, or suspected, or of the commission of which he is suspected; [d] the Petitioner shall not, directly or indirectly, make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence;

[e] the Petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial;

[f] On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Judicial Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the Petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court 4/6

in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560]; and [g] If the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 269 B.N.S.

12.09.2024 smn To 1.The XVIII Metropolitan Magistrate, Saidapet, Chennai 2.The Central Prison, Puzhal, Chennai 3.The Inspector of Police E3 Teynampet Police Station, Chennai 4.The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras.

P.DHANABAL, J.

5/6

smn 12.09.2024 6/6