Madras High CourtCRL OP/25745/2021dismissed

Ananth v. State Rep By

2022-01-03Honourable Mrs Justice T.V.Thamilselvi2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Monday, the Third day of January Two Thousand Twenty Two PRESENT The Hon`ble Mrs Justice T.V. THAMILSELVI CRIMINAL ORIGINAL PETITION No.25745 of 2021 ANANTH [ PETITIONER / ACCUSED ] Vs STATE REP BY [ RESPONDENT ] THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, ALL WOMEN POLICE STAION, MAYILADUTHURAI TALUK AND DISTRICT.

CRIME NO.56 OF 2021 For Petitioner : M/S.A.SHANKAR Advocate For Respondent : MR.N.S.SUGANTHAN, Government Advocate, (Crl.Side)' PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioner, who apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offence under Sections 417, 420, 341, 352, 376 of IPC, in Crime No.56 of 2021 on the file of the respondent police, seeks anticipatory bail.

2. The case of the prosecution is that there was love affair between the petitioner and the defacto complainant. Further, the petitioner had sexual intercourse with the defacto complainant. Thereafter, the petitioner had refused to marry the defacto complainant. Hence, the complaint.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is an innocent person and he has been falsely implicated in this case. Hence, he prays for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

4. The learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) submitted that the petitioner had sexual intercourse with the defacto complainant. Thereafter, the petitioner had refused to marry the defacto complainant. He further submitted that the investigation is still pending and the statement under Section 164 Cr.P.C., yet to be recorded. Hence, he vehemently opposed for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and also the fact that the investigation is still pending and the statement under Section 164 Cr.P.C.,yet to be recorded, this Court is not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

6. Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed. -sd/- 03/01/2022 This order, on being produced, be punctually observed and carried into execution by all concerned TRUE COPY Sub-Assistant Registrar (Statistics/C.S.) High Court, Madras - 600 104.

TO 1 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, ALL WOMEN POLICE STAION, MAYILADUTHURAI TALUK AND DISTRICT.

2 THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT, MADRAS.

+1 CC to M/S.A.SHANKAR Advocate on payment of necessary charges SR.NO.73 CRL OP.25745/2021 Date :03/01/2022 RW 07/01/2022 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/