A.Eswaran v. The Commissioner Of

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 22.01.2020

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE D. KRISHNAKUMAR W.P.Nos.8637 of 2017 & 32083 of 2016 and W.M.P.Nos.9444 & 9445 of 2017 and 27821 & 27822 of 2016 A.Eswaran ..Petitioner (in both WPs) Vs 1.The Commission of Corporation, Corporation of Chennai, Ribbon Building, Chennai-600 003.

2.The City Health Officer, Corporation of Chennai, Chennai-600 003.

... Respondents (in both WPs) 3.S.Ravichandran ..3rd Respondent in W.P.No.8637/2017 4.M.Ramesh ...3rd Respondent in W.P.No.32083/2016 5.N.Sathish Kumar ...4th Respondent in W.P.No.32083/2016 Prayer in W.P.No.8637 of 2017:

Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records pending on the file of the 1st respondent order cum proceedings passed by the first respondent in his proceedings No.Po.Su.Thu.Na.Ka.No.C2/4950/2016 dated Nil.03.2017 signed on 24.03.2017 provisionally appointing the 3rd respondent as a Sanitary Officer and quash the same as illegal and unlawful and consequently, direct the 1st respondent to promote the petitioner as the Sanitary Officer and grant all other monitory benefits to the petitioner.

Prayer in W.P.No.32083 of 2016:

Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records pending on the file of the 1st respondent in his proceedings Pu.Su.Du.Na.Ka.No.C2/5645/2015, dated 29.08.2016 which has been approved by the Appointment Committee by its resolution No.107/2016, dated 25.07.2016 authorizing the appointment of 3rd and 4th respondents as a Sanitary Officer by the proceedings of the 1st respondent https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Pu.Su.Du.Na.Ka.No.C2/5645/2015, dated 29.08.2016 and quash the same as illegal and unlawful and consequently, direct the 1st respondent to promote the petitioner as the Sanitary Officer for the panel year 2015-2016 and grant all other monitory benefits to the petitioner.

For Petitioner :

Mr.S. Jaganathan (in both WPs) For Respondents :

Mr.G. Anantha Rangan (in both WPs) for Corporation of Chennai COMMON ORDER The learned counsel appearing for the writ petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the writ petitions and he has also made an endorsement to that effect.

2. In view of the aforesaid submissions and endorsement made by the learned counsel appearing for the writ petitioner, the writ petitions are dismissed as withdrawn. No costs. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petitions are closed.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar (CS-VII) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar msm To 1.The Commission of Corporation, Corporation of Chennai, Ribbon Building, Chennai-600 003.

2.The City Health Officer, Corporation of Chennai, Chennai-600 003.

+2cc to Mr.S.Venkatesh, Advocate, S.R.No. 4173 & 4174 W.P.Nos.8637 of 2017 and 32083 of 2016 MR(CO) GN(24/01/2020) https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/