Venkatesan v. The State Rep. By The Inspector Of Police

RMT.TEEKAA RAMAN, J.

The Petitioners, who apprehend arrest at the hands of the Respondent police for the offence punishable under Sections 294(b), 323, 324 & 506(2) of IPC in Crime No.636 of 2022 on the file of the Respondent police, seek anticipatory bail.

2.The case of the prosecution is that the First Petitioner is the guarantor for the loan obtained by the Defacto Complainant in Corporation Bank during 2014. Since the Defacto Complainant was not able to repay the loan in time, on 17.12.2022, the Petitioners came to the house of the Defacto Complainant, abused him and his wife with filthy language, assaulted them and threatened them with dire consequences. Hence the complaint. 3.The learned Counsel for the Petitioners would submit that the first Petitioner is the guarantor for the loan obtained by the Defacto Complainant. Since the Defacto Complainant failed to repay the same, the first Petitioner is facing CIBIL score issue, which restricts him to obtain any other loans. The Petitioners are ready to comply with the conditions imposed by this Court. Hence, the learned counsel for the Petitioners prays for grant of anticipatory bail to the Petitioners.

4.The learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) for the Respondent 1/ 4

would submit that it is a case in counter and the injured was already discharged from the Hospital. However, he vehemently opposed to grant anticipatory bail to the Petitioners.

5.Heard both sides and perused the materials available on record. 6.Taking into consideration the facts and circumstances of the case and also the submissions made by the learned counsel on either sides and also the fact that it is a case in counter and the injured was already discharged from the Hospital, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the Petitioners with certain conditions.

7.Accordingly, the Petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on their appearance, within a period of fifteen days from the date on which the order copy made ready, before the learned Judicial Magistrate-I, Ulundurpet, on condition that the Petitioners shall execute a separate bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the Respondent police or the police officer who intends to arrest or to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail shall stand dismissed and on further condition that: [a] the Petitioners and the sureties shall affix their photographs and Left Thumb Impression in the surety bond and 2/ 4

the Magistrate may obtain a copy of their Aadhar card or Bank pass Book to ensure their identity;

[b] the Petitioners shall report before the Respondent Police, everyday at 10.30 a.m., for a period of three weeks and thereafter as and when required; [c] the Petitioners shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial. [d] the Petitioners shall not abscond either during investigation or trial.

[e] On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the Petitioners in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the Petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560].

[f] If the accused thereafter abscond, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 229A IPC.

20.09.2023 sai 3/ 4

RMT.TEEKAA RAMAN, J.

sai 20.09.2023 4/ 4