Rajamani v. State Rep. By

Crl.O.P.No. 8 2 2 6 of 2 0 1 6 K. KALYANA S U NDARAM, J.

The petitioners are A2 to A7 and they were arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 07.02.2016 for the alleged offences punishable under sections 302 IPC @ 120(b), 147, 148, 341, 302 read with 149 IPC, in Crime No.45 of 2016 on the file of the respondent police and hence, seek bail. 2 . The case of the prosecution is that the deceased is the son-inlaw of the petitioner and he developed intimacy with one Mohana, which was objected by the first accused and hence, A-6 conspired with A-2, who is his sister's daughter to eliminate the deceased. Pursuant to the conspiracy, the first accused engaged A-3 to 8 to commit murder and agreed to pay Rs.20,000/- each and on 07.02.2016, the first accused along with A-3 to 8 attacked him and caused his death.

3. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners are innocent persons and they have not committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution.

K. KALYANA S U NDARAM, J.

vsg

4. The learned Government Advocate (Criminal side) appearing for the respondent submitted that the co-accused has already been granted bail by this Court in Crl.O.P.No. 4911 of 2016 dated 31.03.2016.

5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioners with certain conditions.

6. Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail on their executing a personal bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate No.III, Erode and on further condition that the petitioners shall report before the respondent police daily at 10.00 a.m. until further orders.

1 2. 0 4. 2 0 1 6 v s g Crl.O.P.No. 8 2 2 6 of 2 0 1 6