← Library
Madras High CourtWP/28907/2025disposed of

R.Kanniammal v. The Chairman

2025-08-05Honourable Mr Justice N. Anand Venkatesh4 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 05.08.2025

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.ANAND VENKATESH and W.M.P.No.32441 of 2025 R.Kanniammal W/o.Late Rathinam ... Petitioner vs.

1.The Chairman Tamil Nadu Generation & Distribution Corp. Ltd., (TANGEDCO), No.144, Anna Salai, Chennai - 600 002.

2.The Executive Engineer, TANGEDCO, Valluvar Kottam, Chennai - 600 034.

3.The Assistant Engineer (O&M), TANGEDCO, Jafferkanpet, West Saidapet, Chennai - 600 015.

4.Subramani ... Respondents Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents 1 to 3 forthwith to consider the petitioner's representation dated 1/4

30.06.2025 and notice dated 22.07.2025 thereby to intervene into the matter of shifting the existing EB Pillar Box to some other space which is already available expediently and further direct the authorities from not to erecting/putting up any New Pillar EB Box in front of the petitioner's pathway having 4 feet breadth which is the only access leading to her property bearing Door No.23, Rajagopal Street, Raja Naicker Garden, West Saidapet, Chennai - 600 015.

For Petitioner : Mr.R.Gokul For Respondents : Mr.L.Jai Venkatesh Standing Counsel [R1 to R3] *****

O R D E R

This writ petition has been filed seeking issuance of a writ of mandamus directing the respondents 1 to 3 to deal with the representation made by the petitioner on 30.06.2025 wherein the petitioner is objecting to the shifting of the existing EB pillar post in front of the petitioner's pathway, which according to the petitioner is the only access leading to her property.

2. Heard Mr.R.Gokul, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr.L.Jai Venkatesh, learned Standing Counsel appearing for respondents 1 to 3.

2/4

3. Learned Standing Counsel appearing for respondents 1 to 3 submitted that the representation made by the petitioner will be considered by the third respondent and the decision will be conveyed to the petitioner.

4. Taking into consideration the facts and circumstances of the case and considering the materials placed before this Court and taking note of the photographs relied upon by the petitioner, there shall be a direction to the third respondent to deal with the representation made by the petitioner and ensure that the EB pillar box does not in anyway cause hindrance to the petitioner's usage of the pathway, which is already in existence. The third respondent shall respond to the petitioner in this regard within a period of four (4) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

This writ petition is disposed of with the above direction. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed. 05.08.2025 Index: Yes/no Speaking Order/Non-Speaking Order gm 3/4

N.ANAND VENKATESH, J gm To 1.The Chairman Tamil Nadu Generation & Distribution Corp. Ltd., (TANGEDCO), No.144, Anna Salai, Chennai - 600 002.

2.The Executive Engineer, TANGEDCO, Valluvar Kottam, Chennai - 600 034.

3.The Assistant Engineer (O&M), TANGEDCO, Jafferkanpet, West Saidapet, Chennai - 600 015.

05.08.2025 4/4