Sivan @ Vinoth v. State Rep By
RMT.TEEKAA RAMAN,J.
The petitioner, who apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offence punishable under Section 420 IPC and Sections 5 and 7(3) of Tamil Nadu Lotteries Regulation Act, 1998, in Crime No. 211 of 2023, seeks anticipatory bail.
2. The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner along with other accused are said to have compelled the defacto complainant to buy banned Lottery tickets. Hence, the case.
3. The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner is an innocent person and he has nothing to do with the alleged offence. He would further submit that the petitioner is ready to abide by any condition that may be imposed by this Court. Hence, he prays for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner.
4. The learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) for the respondent police would submit that there are totally two accused in this case in which, the petitioner is arrayed as A1. He would further submit that the petitioner along with other accused have compelled the defacto complainant to buy banned Lottery tickets. He would further submit that the petitioner is having one previous case similar in nature. Hence, he vehemently opposed to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.
5. Taking into consideration the facts and circumstances of the case, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner subject to the following conditions:
6. Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on his appearance, within a period of fifteen days from the date on which the order copy made ready, before the learned Judicial Magistrate-II, Bhavani, on condition that the petitioner shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand
only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the respondent police or the police officer, who intends to arrest or to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail shall stand dismissed and on further condition that:
[a] the petitioner and the sureties shall affix their photographs and Left Thumb Impression in the surety bond and the Magistrate may obtain a copy of their Aadhar card or Bank pass Book to ensure their identity.
[b] the petitioner shall report before the respondent police daily at 10.30 a.m., until further orders.
[c] the petitioner shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial;
[d] the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial;
[e] On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court
himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560];
[f] If the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 229A IPC;
19.09.2023 ata RMT.TEEKAA RAMAN,J.
ata 19.09.2023