P.Thangaraj Prabu, v. The Commissioner,

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 19.07.2021 THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE D.KRISHNAKUMAR WP.NO.769 OF 2017 & WMP.NOS.802 & 803 OF 2017 P.Thangaraj Prabu ... Petitioner -VsThe Commissioner, Pollachi Municipality, Pollachi, Coimbatore District.

... Respondent Prayer: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the entire records relating to the impugned order passed by the respondent in his proceedings in Na.Ka.No.A6/371/2015, dated 09.09.2016 and consequential order passed by the respondent in his proceedings in Na.Ka.No.A6/371/2016 dated 07.11.2016 and quash the same and consequently, direct the respondent to return back the petitioner's deposit amount by accepting the petitioner's written representation dated 02.11.2016.

For Petitioner : Mr.C.Prakasam For Respondents : Mr.B.Anand

ORDER

Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the EMD amount has been received by the petitioner and hence, the prayer as sought in the Writ Petition has become infructuous.

2. In the light of the submission made by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, the writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CS VI) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar dn https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

To The Commissioner, Pollachi Municipality, Pollachi, Coimbatore District.

+1cc to Mr.A.S.Thambuswamy, Advocate, S.R.No.34534 W.P.No.769 of 2017 LN(CO) CS/13/08/2021 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/