M.S.Jayaraman v. State Represented By

Crl.O.P.No.23524 of 2023 C.V.KARTHIKEYAN, J.

The petitioners who apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under Sections 143, 294(b), 447, 427 and 506(I) in Crime No.263 of 2019, seek anticipatory bail.

2.It must be stated that the petitioners herein had earlier filed Crl.O.P.No.9628 of 2022 and by an order dated 27.04.2022, a learned Single Judge of this Court had granted anticipatory bail to the petitioners herein. One of the condition was that, they should deposit a sum of Rs.25,000/- to the credit of Crime No.263 of 2019 and to execute separate bond for a sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties. Since the condition had not been satisfied, the orders granting anticipatory bail stood automatically cancelled.

1/2 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

C.V.KARTHIKEYAN , J.

smv 3.The learned counsel has therefore stated that this petitioner may be considered by this Court.

4.However, on the side of the respondent, it is stated that showing the petitioners as absconding, charge sheet has been filed before the District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate Court, Vanur and taken cognizance in C.C.No.15 of 2023.

5.Taking into consideration the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners. Accordingly, this criminal original petition stands dismissed. 6.The petitioners should appear before the learned District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate, Vanur, on receipt of summons and it is for the learned District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate to pass necessary orders in manner known to law, since the petitioners are shown as absconding accused.

12.10.2023 smv Crl.O.P.No.23524 of 2023 2/2 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis