V.Rangasamy v. The District Collector

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 08.01.2020

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.V.KARTHIKEYAN Writ Petition No.28820 of 2019 V.Rangasamy

...Petitioner

Vs 1.The District Collector, Krishnagiri District.

2.The Tahsildar, Krishnagiri District.

3.The Village Administrative Officer, Puthiya Panchaliyur (Village), Pethathalapallib (P.O), Krishnagiri Disitrict.

... Respondents PRAYER Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of The Constitution of India, to issue Writ of Mandamus directing the first and second respondents to pay the old age pension with reference to the sanction order dated 06.08.2013 and pay arrears from 06.08.2013.

For Petitioner : Mr.R.Dhineshkumar For Respondents : Mrs.P.Rajalakshmi Additional Government Pleader

O R D E R

Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned counsel for the petitioner stated that the writ petition has actually been filed seeking arrears from the department for which the sanction was granted. However, the respondents have granted pension only with effect from November 2019.

2. This Court is of the opinion that since the Government has come forward to pay the pension to the petitioner, the petitioner should be satisfied with the same and subsequently, no further order is required.

3. The writ petition stands closed. No costs. Sd/- Assistant Registrar (CS-VI) //True Copy// https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ Sub Assistant Registrar sbn

To 1.The District Collector, Krishnagiri District.

2.The Tahsildar, Krishnagiri District.

3.The Village Administrative Officer, Puthiya Panchaliyur (Village), Pethathalapallib (P.O), Krishnagiri Disitrict.

+1cc to the Government Pleader, S.R.No. 2224 Writ Petition No.28820 of 2019 KK(CO) GN(18/02/2020) https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/