M/S.Raju v. M/S.K. Paramasivam
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 28.03.2018
CORAM:
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE C.R.P.(PD) No.564 of 2004 and C.M.P.No.5629 of 2004 1.Raju 2.Rajendran 3.Selvarajau
...Petitioners
vs.
1.K.Paramasivam 2.Sarada 3.Narayanasamy 4.Kandasamy 5.Ramasamy 6.The District Collector, Namakkal District, Namakkal.
...Respondents
Prayer: Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, against the Order dated 24.2.2004 made in I.A.No.47 of 2004 in O.S.No.538 of 2001 on the file of the District Munsiff Court, Namakkal.
For Petitioners : No Appearance For Respondents : No Appearance
ORDER
There is no representation on the side of the petitioner once again. Even on the earlier hearing date on 09.02.2018, there was no representation on the side of the petitioner. The petitioner has also not taken steps to serve the notice on R1 to R3.
https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/
2.Accordingly, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed. However, there shall be no order as to costs. Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CS-IV) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar pam To, 1.The District Munsiff Court, Namakkal.
2.The District Collector, Namakkal District, Namakkal.
C.R.P.(PD) No.564 of 2004 and C.M.P.No.5629 of 2004 MR(CO) TR(21/05/2018) https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/