Papankulam Co.Operative Stores v. Presiding Officer,

IN THE JUDICATE OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

DATE : 02.03.2018 CORUM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE P.D.AUDIKESAVALU W.P.No.33122 of 2003 and WPMP No.40091 of 2003 Papankulam Co-operative Stores, Papankulam (via) Pottalputhur, Ambasamudram Taluk, Tirunelveli District ... Petitioner Vs.

1. Presiding Officer, Labour Court, Tirunelveli

2. Nallasivan ... Respondents Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Certiorari to call for the records in I.A.No.294 of 1998 in I.D.No.56 of 1997 dated 19.02.2001 on the file of the first respondent and quash the same.

For Petitioner : No appearance For 1st respondent : Labour Court For 2nd respondent : Mr.L.P. Balaji Ram

ORDER

When the matter is taken up for hearing today, there is no representation for the petitioner. However, the learned counsel for the second respondent submits that a letter addressed by him to the second respondent has been returned unserved with postal endorsement "addressee deceased" and that he does not have the particulars of the legal heirs of the second respondent and he has also filed a Memo to that effect.

2. In the absence of the legal representatives of the said deceased respondent, it would not be possible to further prosecute the writ petition, which has already abated. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

3. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as abated. However, it is made clear that it is open to the petitioner to pursue appropriate remedy in accordance with law to reopen the writ petition as soon as the legal representatives of the said deceased respondent are ascertained. No costs. Consequently, connected WPMP is closed.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CS V) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar sr To The Presiding Officer, Labour Court, Tirunelveli W.P.No.33122 of 2003 ss(co) aa22/03/2018 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/