Dinesh Raheja v. State Rep.By

Crl.O.P.No.8749 of 2016 K.KALYANASUNDARAM, J.

The petitioner apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offences punishable under sections 294(B) and 506(ii) of IPC, in Crime No.536 of 2016 on the file of the respondent police and hence, seeks anticipatory bail.

2.The case of the prosecution is that when the petitioner carried out interior work in the defacto complainant's house, a wordy quarrel arose, pursuant thereto, the defacto complainant was abused and threatened by the petitioner.

3.The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is innocent and he has been falsely implicated in this case. 4.The learned Government Advocate (Criminal side) appearing for the respondent would submit that the petitioner has no injury in this occurrence.

5.Considering the above facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner with certain conditions.

K.KALYANASUNDARAM, J.

vs 6.Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on his appearance before the learned XVII Metropolitan Magistrate, Saidapet, Chennai and on his executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and the petitioner shall appear before the respondent police daily at 10.00 a.m. for a period of two weeks and thereafter as and when required, for interrogation. The petitioner shall comply with the condition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. scrupulously.

7. The petitioner shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy made ready, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail stands dismissed. 20.04.2016 vs Crl.O.P.No.8749 of 2016