Vijay v. The State Rep By Its,

A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA , J.

The petitioner, who was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 13.09.2022 for the alleged offences punishable under Sections 294(b), 307 & 506(ii) of IPC in Crime No.669 of 2022, seeks bail.

2. The case of the prosecution is that due to the previous enmity, the petitioner waylaid the de-facto complainant and by abusing the de-facto complainant in a filthy language and attempted to cut his neck using blade, due to which, he sustained injuries in his hand. Hence the complaint.

3. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner is an innocent person and due to the previous enmity, a false case had been foisted as against the petitioner. He would further submit that the petitioner is in custody from 13.09.2022 and he is

ready to abide by any stringent conditions that may be imposed by this Court. Hence, he prays for grant of bail to the petitioner.

4. The learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) would submit that the petitioner is a habitual offender and there are 14 previous cases pending against him. Hence, he vehemently opposed to grant bail to the petitioner. The previous cases against the petitioner are tabulated hereunder:- S.No PS Crime No.

Sections 1.

C1 Flower Bazar 1656/2016 379 IPC 2.

C1 Flower Bazar 692/2018 379 IPC 3.

H8 Korrukupettai 1456/2018 147, 148, 341, 387, 506(ii) IPC 4.

H8 Korrukupettai 1458/2018 382 IPC 5.

H8 Korrukupettai 337/2018 392 IPC 6.

H8 Korrukupettai 326/2017 397 IPC 7.

M8 Sathangadu 326/2018 397 IPC 8.

M8 Sathangadu 337/2018 392 IPC 9.

M8 Sathangadu 339/2018 294(b), 336, 341, 392, 397, 427, 506(ii) IPC

S.No PS Crime No.

Sections 10.

M8 Sathangadu 458/2020 392 IPC 11.

M8 Sathangadu 220/2019 147, 148, 294(b), 323, 324, 506(ii) IPC 12.

M8 Sathangadu 49/2020 294(b), 324, 341, 506(ii) IPC @ 294(b), 324,34, 341, 506(ii) IPC 13.

M8 Sathangadu 2317/2020 294(b), 341, 307 IPC 14.

T15 SRMC 294(b), 341, 323, 36, 427, 307, 397, 506(2) IPC

5. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) for the respondent and perused the materials available on record.

6. Taking into consideration the facts and circumstances of the case and taking note of the fact that the petitioner is a habitual offender and having 14 previous cases, this Court is not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.

A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA , J.

ham

7. Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition stands dismissed.

02.11.2022 ham 02.11.2022