← Library
Madras High CourtHCP/1829/2023withdrawn dismissed

Jeevitha v. State Rep By

2023-09-21Honourable Mr Justice M. Sundar,Honourable Mr.Justice R.Sakthivel5 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 21.09.2023

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.SUNDAR and THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.SAKTHIVEL H.C.P.No.1829 of 2023 Jeevitha .. Petitioner Vs 1.The Secretary to the Government, Government of Tamil Nadu (Home) Prohibition and Excise Department, Secretariat, Fort St. George, Chennai - 9.

2.The District Collector and District Magistrate, Thiruvannamalai District, Thiruvannamalai.

3.The Superintendent of Police, Thiruvannamalai District, Thiruvannamalai.

4.The Inspector of Police, Thatchampet Police Station, Thiruvannamalai District.

5.The Superintendent of Prison, Central Prison, Vellore, Vellore District.

.. Respondents Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of a writ of habeas corpus to call for the entire Page Nos.1/5

records connected with the order of the second respondent herein concerned in D.O.No.74/2023-C2 dated 09.08.2023 and quash the order of detention passed therein by the second respondent herein against the detenu and direct the respondents herein to produce the body and person of the detenu by name Mamalaivasan, male, aged about 31 years, son of Arumugam, now detained at Central Prison, Vellore, Vellore District before this Court and set him at liberty forthwith.

For Petitioner :

Mr.B.Koteswara Rao for Mr.S.M.Nandhie Devhan For Respondents :

Mr.E.Raj Thilak Additional Public Prosecutor

ORDER

[Order of the Court was made by M.SUNDAR, J.,] Matter mentioned when the Court proceedings commenced in the forenoon.

2. Mr.B.Koteswara Rao, learned counsel representing the counsel on record for petitioner submitted that the impugned preventive detention order has since been revoked. Learned counsel also submitted that the detenu has since come out of prison and he is free. Learned counsel sought leave to withdraw captioned 'Habeas Corpus Petition' (hereinafter 'HCP' for the sake of brevity, convenience and Page Nos.2/5

clarity). Learned counsel made an endorsement in the case file in this regard and a scanned reproduction of the same is as follows:.

3. Aforementioned endorsement in the case file is reiterated in the hearing.

4. In the light of the aforementioned endorsement and reiteration of the same, captioned HCP is disposed of as closed/withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs. (M.S.,J.) (R.S.V.,J.) 21.09.2023 Index : Yes/No mmi Page Nos.3/5

To 1.The Secretary to the Government, Government of Tamil Nadu (Home) Prohibition and Excise Department, Secretariat, Fort St. George, Chennai - 9.

2.The District Collector and District Magistrate, Thiruvannamalai District, Thiruvannamalai.

3.The Superintendent of Police, Thiruvannamalai District, Thiruvannamalai.

4.The Inspector of Police, Thatchampet Police Station, Thiruvannamalai District.

5.The Superintendent of Prison, Central Prison, Vellore, Vellore District.

6.The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras.

Page Nos.4/5

M.SUNDAR, J., and R.SAKTHIVEL, J., mmi H.C.P.No.1829 of 2023 21.09.2023 Page Nos.5/5