← Library
Madras High CourtWP/5842/2017dismissed for nonprosecution

Rajamanickam v. The State Of Tamil Nadu

2023-11-27Honourable Mr Justice P. Velmurugan4 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

Dated : 27.11.2023 Coram:

THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE P. VELMURUGAN W.P.No.5842 of 2017 1.Rajamanickam 2.Thangaselvi 3.Malarvizhi 4.Bhuvaneswari 5.Jayammal 6.Murugesan 7.Selvi Jabaselvi 8.Mallika 9.Rangarajan 10.Bhanumathi Stella 11.Natarajan 12.Rajamoorthy 13.Palanisamy 14.Rajendran 15.Krishnaveni 16.Subbulakshmi 17.Bharanidharan 18.Anubhama 19.Subramaniam 20.Manickam 21.Uma Maheswari 22.Meenakshisundaram 23.Kamalaveni 24.Nandakumar 25.Christopher Correya 26.Elanchezhiyan 27.Vennila 28.Padmavathi 29.Priya 30.Vanaja 31.Viswanathan

32.Murugan 33.Appavoo 34.Latha 35.Thirumalaisamy 36.Vijayakumar

...Petitioners

Vs.

1.State of Tamil Nadu Represented by its Secretary Department of Housing and Urban Development Fort St.George Chennai - 600 009.

2.Chairman-cum-Managing Director Tamil Nadu Housing Board Nandhanam Chennai - 600 035.

3.The Special Tahsildar (Land Acquisition) Housing Scheme No.1 Sivanandha Colony Coimbatore - 641 012.

...Respondents

Prayer: This writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, with a prayer to issue a writ of declaration, declaring that the entire land acquisition proceedings for the lands comprised in S.F.Nos.66 and 66/1, Ganapathy Village, Coimbatore District under Section 4 (1) Notification dated 18/08/1983 in G.O.Ms.No.1274, Housing and Urban Development and Section 6 Declaration published in G.O.Ms.No.906 dated 05/09/1985 and in Award No.2 of 1987 dated 06/04/1987 had lapsed as per Section 24 (2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition and Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013, Act 30 of 2013, and render justice.

For Petitioners :A.M.Venkatakrishnan,T.pandiyan For Respondents :

Mr.V.Veluchamy (R1 and R3) Additional Government Pleader :

V.Gunasekar (R2) Senior Counsel

O R D E R

This Writ Petition is pending from the year 2017. Already several times and several opportunities have been given to the petitioners. Which shows that the Petitioners are not interested to prosecute this writ petition as the writ petition is pending for the years together.

2. When this writ petition came up for hearing lastly on 06.11.2023, the learned Counsel for the Petitioners seek time for change of vakalat in order to change, this Court granted time and now even after 20 days passed away and today also they are seeking for adjournment which shows the lack of interest to prosecute this writ petition any more by the petitioners and under these circumstances this Court is not inclined to grant adjournment. Hence the writ petition is dismissed for nonprosecution. No costs. 27.11.2023 Index :Yes/No Speaking : Yes/No Internet : Yes/No nst

P. VELMURUGAN,J.

nst To:

1.State of Tamil Nadu Represented by its Secretary Department of Housing and Urban Development Fort St.George Chennai - 600 009.

2.Chairman-cum-Managing Director Tamil Nadu Housing Board Nandhanam Chennai - 600 035.

3.The Special Tahsildar (Land Acquisition) Housing Scheme No.1 Sivanandha Colony Coimbatore - 641 012.

W.P.No.5842 of 2017 27.11.2023