Venkatesan v. State Rep By

Crl.OP.No.26182 of 2022 Crl.O.P.No.26182 of 2022 A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA, J.

The petitioner who apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offence punishable under Sections 341, 294(b), 386, 506(ii) of IPC and 25(1)(a) of Arms Act, in Crime No.408 of 2022 on the file of the respondent police, seek anticipatory bail.

2. The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner along with other accused waylaid the de-facto complainant's lorry, threatened using aruval and robbed a sum of Rs.2,000/- and a mobile phone from the de-facto complainant's employee. Hence the case.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner is an innocent person and he is no way connected with the alleged offence. Hence he prays to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

4. The learned Government Advocate (Crl.side) appearing for the respondent would submit that there are 3 cases pending as against the petitioner and hence he vehemently opposed to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

Crl.OP.No.26182 of 2022 A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA, J.

mpl

5. Taking into consideration the allegations and also the bad antecedent of the petitioner and that the custodial interrogation of the petitioner is essential, this Court is not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

6. Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed. 28.10.2022 mpl Crl.O.P.No.26182 of 2022 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis