A.C.Purandaradasan v. Union Territory Of Puducherry Rep By

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Monday, the Twenty Fourth day of January Two Thousand Twenty Two PRESENT THE HON'BLE MRS.JUSTICE T.V.THAMILSELVI CRIMINAL ORIGINAL PETITION No.25887 of 2021 A.C.PURANDARADASAN [ PETITIONER / ACCUSED ] Vs THE UNION TERRITORY OF PUDUCHERRY REP BY, [ RESPONDENT ] THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, MUDALIARPET POLICE STATION, PUDUCHERRY.

CRIME NO. 128 OF 2021.

For Petitioner : M/S. A.KRIPAKARAN, Advocate For Respondent : MR.V.BALAMURUGANE, Additional Public Prosecutor for Puducherry.

For Intervener : M/S.J.E.R.LENIN, Advocate PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioner, who apprehends arrest for the alleged offence under Section 420 of IPC in Crime No.128 of 2021, seeks anticipatory bail.

2. The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner has projected himself as an advocate and cheated the defacto complainant. Hence the case.

3. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner has not committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution and he has been falsely implicated in this case. He further submitted that the petitioner co-operated for the enquiry as per the direction given in this earlier order. Hence, he prays for grant of anticipatory bail with any condition. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

4. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor (P) submitted that one previous case pending against the petitioner. Hence, he vehemently opposed to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

5. The learned counsel for the Intervenor raised objection stating that no other witness was examined by the Investigating Agency, if he released on bail tampering the evidence, he also took steps to alter the Section with regard to impersonation. He further submitted that some other persons created fabricated documents in order to grab the properties.

6. Considering the facts and circumstances of this case, that the petitioner is running the Welfare Association for Germany Community from the year 2015, under the guise of this association the petitioner indulge the law of any activities, the complaint pending before the CBCID, Puducherry, the complaint given by one Dayanithi, if he released on bail he is absconding and tamper the evidence, this Court is not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner, interim bail is vacated.

7. Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed. -sd/- 24/01/2022 This order, on being produced, be punctually observed and carried into execution by all concerned TRUE COPY Sub-Assistant Registrar (Statistics/C.S.) High Court, Madras - 600 104.

TO 1 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, MUDALIARPET POLICE STATION, PUDUCHERRY.

2 THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR PUDUCHERRY.

+2 CC to M/S. J.E.R.LENIN Advocate on payment of necessary charges SR.NO.1078 CRL OP.25887/2021 Date :24/01/2022 RW 31/01/2022 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/