Madras High CourtWP/40343/2016withdrawn dismissed

Mrs.Suganya Anandaraman, v. The Divisional Railway

2016-11-22Honourable Mr Justice B. Rajendran3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 22.11.2016

CORAM:

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE B.RAJENDRAN W.P.No.40343 of 2016 Suganya Anandaraman ... Petitioner

Versus

1. The Divisional Railway Manager, Chennai Division, Southern Railway, Park Town, Chennai - 600 003.

2. The Additional Divisional Railway Manager / Estate Officer, Chennai Division, Southern Railway, Park Town, Chennai - 600 003.

3. The Senior Divisional Engineer Co-ordination, Chennai Division, Southern Railway, Park Town, Chennai - 600 003.

4. The Divisional Engineer South, Park Town, Chennai - 600 003.

5. The Additional Divisional Engineer, Tambaram, Chennai Division, Southern Railway, Tambaram Railway Station,

6. The Senior Section Engineer, Works/Tambaram, Tambaram Railway Station Area, ... Respondents Writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for the issuance of a writ of mandamus, to direct the respondents herein to restore status quo ante by putting up the kiosk stall as it stood so as to enable the petitioner to do business or in the alternative directing the respondents to pay compensation for loss of business, reputation and property.

For Petitioner :

Mr.T.Thiyagarajan For Respondents :

Mr.P.T.Ramkumar, Standing Counsel

ORDER

The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to approach the Civil Forum for damages. He has also made an endorsement to that effect.

2. In view of the endorsement made by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to the petitioner to approach the appropriate Civil Forum for claiming damages alone. No costs. Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CS III) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar ogy To