Madras High CourtCRL OP/25991/2021dismissed

Muvarasan v. The Inspector Of Police

2022-01-04Honourable Mrs Justice T.V.Thamilselvi2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Tuesday, the Fourth day of January Two Thousand Twenty Two PRESENT THE HON'BLE MRS.JUSTICE T.V.THAMILSELVI CRIMINAL ORIGINAL PETITION No.25991 of 2021 1 MUVARASAN [ PETITIONERS / ACCUSED ] 2 AMBIKA 3 SATHYA 4 ANNAKILI 5 KAVERI @ PARIMALA 6 PARTHIBAN 7 ANJALI 8 POONGOTHAI 9 ARUMUGAM Vs THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE [ RESPONDENT ] C-3 MANIMANGALAM POLICE STATION, KANCHEEPURAM.

CRIME NO. 980/2021 For Petitioner : M/S.R.MUKESH KANNAH Advocate For Respondent : MR.N.S.SUGANTHAN, Government Advocate, (Crl.Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioners, who apprehend arrest for the alleged offence under Sections 294 (b), 465, 467, 468, 471, 472, 427, 506(I) of IPC in Cr.No.980 of 2021, seeks anticipatory bail. 2.The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner/A1 created a fake Patta in his name and trespassed into the defacto complainant land and broken the fence around the land along with other petitioners, abused him with filthy language, threatened him with dire consequences. Hence, the law enforcing agency registered a case against the petitioners.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

3.The learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners have not committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution and they have been falsely implicated in this case. Hence he prays for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioners. 4.The learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) raised objection stating that petitioner/A1 created a fake Patta by using Government emblems in his name and trespassed into the defacto complainant's land along with other petitioners, threatened him. He further submitted that investigation is not yet completed.

5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and also considering the gravity of offence committed by the petitioners, this court is not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners.

6. Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed. -sd/- 04/01/2022 This order, on being produced, be punctually observed and carried into execution by all concerned TRUE COPY Sub-Assistant Registrar (Statistics/C.S.) High Court, Madras - 600 104.

TO 1 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE C-3 MANIMANGALAM POLICE STATION, KANCHEEPURAM.

2 THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT, MADRAS.

CC to M/S.R.MUKESH KANNAH Advocate on payment of necessary charges CRL OP.25991/2021 Date :04/01/2022 RW 20/01/2022 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/