N.Perumal v. State Represented By,

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Friday, the Seventeenth day of June Two Thousand Twenty Two PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr Justice G.K. ILANTHIRAIYAN CRIMINAL ORIGINAL PETITION No.25932 of 2021 1 N.PERUMAL [ PETITIONERS / ACCUSED ] 2 P.VIJAYALAKSHMI 3 P.KAVITHA 4 P.KUMARAVELU Vs STATE REPRESENTED BY, [ RESPONDENT ] THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, ALL WOMEN POLICE STATION, AMBATTUR.

(CRIME NO. NOT KNOWN OF 2021) For Petitioners : M/S.C.K.SURESH, Advocate For Respondent : MR.A.DAMODARAN, Additional public Prosecutor PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioners, who apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under Sections 498(A) and 506(2) of I.P.C, in Crime No. Not known of 2021, seek anticipatory bail.

2. When the mater is taken up for hearing, the learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondent Police submitted that FIR in Crime No.8 of 2021 has been registered against the petitioners. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

3. In view of the submissions made by the learned Additional Public Prosecutor, the petition is dismissed with a liberty to file a fresh petition.

-sd/- 17/06/2022 This order, on being produced, be punctually observed and carried into execution by all concerned TRUE COPY Sub-Assistant Registrar (Statistics/C.S.) High Court, Madras - 600 104.

TO 1 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, ALL WOMEN POLICE STATION, AMBATTUR.

2 THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT, MADRAS.

CC to M/S.C.K.SURESH, Advocate on payment of necessary charges CRL OP.25932/2021 Date :17/06/2022 JPA 27/06/2022 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/