B.Manuibrahimkutty v. The District Collector,

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 10-02-2026

CORAM

THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE WP No. 29503 of 2019 AND WMP Nos.29371 & 29373 OF 2019 B.Manuibrahimkutty ..Petitioner(s) Vs

1. The District Collector, Coimbatore

2. Revenue Divisional Officer, Coimbatore (South), Coimbatore

3. The Tahsildar, Madukkarai Taluk, Coimbatore ..Respondent(s) calling for records and to quash the order dated by 12.1.2018 made in Na. Ka. NO. 3728/ 2017/ A3 by the second respondent and to declare the order dated 9.3.2017 passed by the third respondent Tahsildar, Madukkarai is valid.

For Petitioner(s):

No appearance For Respondent(s):

MR.D.Ravichander,SGP

Order The name of the counsel on record for the petitioner ought not to have been printed in the cause list today since the counsel on record for the petitioner has reported no instructions on the last hearing date i.e. on 22.01.2026 and had also withdrawn his vakalat.

2.As directed by this Court on 22.01.2026, the name of the petitioner is printed in the cause list today. There is no representation on the side of the petitioner. The petitioner has also not engaged any new counsel in the place of the earlier counsel.

3.This writ petition is of the year 2019. It can now be inferred that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting this writ petition. Hence, this writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution.

4.While issuing the order copy, the registry shall not mention the name of the counsel on record for the petitioner instead mention that the petitioner was not represented.

10-02-2026 VGA

To

1. The District Collector, Coimbatore

2. Revenue Divisional Officer, Coimbatore (South), Coimbatore

3. The Tahsildar, Madukkarai Taluk, Coimbatore

ABDUL QUDDHOSE J.

VGA WP No. 29503 of 2019 AND WMP Nos.29371 & 29373 OF 2019 10-02-2026