R.Anandayee v. The Commissioner,
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 06.12.2021 CORAM :
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M. DURAISWAMY AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J. SATHYA NARAYANA PRASAD 1.R.Anandayee 2.P.Indirani 3.E.Jayalakshmi 4.S.Jayanthi 5.S.Kala 6.M.Valli 7.R.Jothi 8.R.Lingaraj 9.E.Vimala 10.B.Kantha 11.A.Sagayam 12.P.Selvi 13.S.Shanthi 14.D.Fathima Mary 15.D.Devanesan 16.R.Klara 17.D.David 18.A.Eswari 19.S.Irudhaya Mary 20.R.Umarani 21.S.Manimala ...
Review Applicants Vs.
Page 1/6
1.The Commissioner, Greater Chennai Corporation, Rippon Buildings, Chennai - 600 003.
2.The Assistant Commissioner, Corporation of Chennai, No.6, Basin Bridge Road, Chennai - 600 021.
3.The Area Engineer, Chennai Corporation, Ward-56, Zone-5, Unit-13, No.57, Ibrahimji Street, Chennai - 600 001.
4.The Commissioner of Police, Greater Chennai, Vepery, Chennai - 600 007.
5.The Chairman, Tamil Nadu Slum Clearance Board, Chepauk, Chennai - 600 005.
6.B.V.Suresh Kumar ... Respondents Review Application filed under Order XLVII Rule 1 read with Section 114 of the Code of Civil Procedure to review the order dated 06.09.2019 passed in W.P.No.26581 of 2019.
Page 2/6
For Applicants : Mr.M.Gnanasekar For R1 to R3 : Mr.K.Raja Srinivas Standing Counsel For R4 : Mr.C.D.Modi Government Advocate For R5 : Mr.M.Rajasekar
O R D E R
(Order of the Court was made by M. DURAISWAMY, J.) When the Review Application is taken up for hearing, Mr.M.Rajasekar, learned counsel appearing for the 5th respondent-Tamil Nadu Slum Clearance Board, submitted that the construction at Moolakothalam is likely to be completed within few months from today and further submitted that the 5th respondent is willing to allot the houses to the applicants at Moolakothalam as soon as the construction is completed. He has also stated that, in the event of such allotment, the applicants may be directed to pay the lease-cum-sale amount as demanded by the Tamil Nadu Slum Clearance Board. 2.Mr.M.Gnanasekar, learned counsel appearing for the review applicants submitted that the applicants are willing to pay the amount, as demanded by the Page 3/6
Slum Clearance Board, on allotment of the houses at Moolakothalam. 3.Mr.M.Rajasekar, learned counsel appearing for the 5th respondentTamil Nadu Slum Clearance Board, submitted that the applicants have been accommodated in Kannaki Nagar, Okkiyam Duraipakkam, and as per the list forwarded by the Corporation of Chennai, as early as in the year 2020, temporary allotments were already made and in view of the allotment of houses in favour of the review applicants, the houses at Okkiyam Duraipakkam may be allotted permanently in favour of the temporary allotees, for which, Mr.M.Gnanasekar, learned counsel for the review applicants, has no objection. The learned counsel for the review applicants also stated that the submissions made by the learned counsel on either side may be recorded and the Review Application may be closed.
4.Recording the submissions made by the learned counsel on either side, the Review Application stands closed.
[M.D., J.] [J.S.N.P., J.] 06.12.2021 mkn Page 4/6
Index : Yes/No Internet : Yes Speaking order / Nonspeaking order To 1.The Commissioner, Greater Chennai Corporation, Rippon Buildings, Chennai - 600 003.
2.The Assistant Commissioner, Corporation of Chennai, No.6, Basin Bridge Road, Chennai - 600 021.
3.The Area Engineer, Chennai Corporation, Ward-56, Zone-5, Unit-13, No.57, Ibrahimji Street, Chennai - 600 001.
4.The Commissioner of Police, Greater Chennai, Vepery, Chennai - 600 007.
5.The Chairman, Tamil Nadu Slum Clearance Board, Chepauk, Chennai - 600 005.
Page 5/6
M. DURAISWAMY, J.
and J. SATHYA NARAYANA PRASAD, J.
mkn 06.12.2021 Page 6/6