Arul @ Arutselvam v. Mathivanna

C.M.P.No.4284 of 2024 in C.M.A.Sr.No.117414 of 2022 R.HEMALATHA , J.

This Civil Miscellaneous Petition has been filed seeking to condone the delay of 59 days in filing the Civil Miscellaneous Appeal.

2. Heard M. Lokesh, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner/claimant.

3. Mrs.I. Malar, learned counsel who undertakes to file vakalat on behalf of the second respondent Insurance Company did not raise any serious objection in allowing this petition. 4.Having satisfied with the reasons assigned in the affidavit filed in support of this petition, the miscellaneous petition is allowed and the delay of 59 days in filing the above appeal is condoned.

5. Registry is directed to number the main Civil Miscellaneous Appeal, if it is otherwise in order, and print the name of Mrs.I. Malar as counsel for the second respondent at the time of admission of the appeal.

6. It is made clear that for the period of delay of 59 days, the petitioner will not be entitled for any interest if in the event of this Court enhancing the amount of compensation fixed by the Tribunal. 29.10.2024 bga https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis