← Library
Madras High CourtWP/27737/2023disposed of

Mas Hr Solutions v. Deputy State Tax Officer 2

2023-09-25Honourable Mr Justice C. Saravanan4 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 25.09.2023 CORAM :

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.SARAVANAN and W.M.P.Nos.27225 and 27226 of 2023 MAS HR Solutions, Represented by its propritrix S.Vijayalakshmi, No.1/112, Perumal Koil Street, Kandigai, Kancheepuram - 600 127.

... Petitioner Vs.

1.Deputy State Tax Officer - 2, Thirukazhukundram Assessment Circle, No.42, Wahab Road, Thirukuzhukundram - 603 109.

2.Deputy Commissioner (ST), GST Appeal - Chennai - II, No.1, Greams Road, Chennai - 600 006.

... Respondents Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, for issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the impugned proceedings of the first respondent passed in GSTIN 33AVMPV9120D1ZH/2021-2022 dated 08.03.2023 (digitally signed on 08.05.2023) and quash the same further direct the first respondent to re-do the assessment in accordance with law after granting opportunity of personal hearing.

Page No. 1 of 4

For Petitioner : Mr.N.Murali For Respondents : Mrs.E.Ranganayaki Special Government Pleader

ORDER

Mrs.E.Ranganayaki, learned Special Government Pleader takes notice on behalf of the respondents.

2. This writ petition is being disposed at the time of admission after hearing the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Special Government Pleader for the respondents and after dispensing with the requirement of filing of the counter affidavit, considering the fact that the petitioner has filed the returns belatedly.

3. The petitioner may have a case on merits. It is noticed that the petitioner has however failed to participate in the adjudication process that preceded the issuance of the impugned Assessment Order dated 08.03.2023.

4. The petitioner has also failed to file an appeal in time that is within 90 days from the receipt of the order and within a further period of 30 days being the period within which, the delay can be condoned. But, the appeal Page No. 2 of 4

has been filed by the petitioner only on 12.09.2023. This court has taken a consistent view by allowing parties to workout the remedy before the Appellate Forum.

5. Considering the fact that the petitioner has filed the appeal beyond the condonable period i.e., after the expiry of 6 days on 12.09.2023, Court is inclined to direct the second respondent to consider the petitioner's appeal and pass appropriate orders on merits and in accordance with law without reference to limitation.

6. Needless to state, before passing such order, the petitioner shall be heard.

7. This Writ Petition is disposed of with the above observations. No costs. Consequently, connected Writ Miscellaneous Petitions are closed. 25.09.2023 Index : Yes/No Internet : Yes/No Speaking Order/Non-Speaking Order mac/arb Page No. 3 of 4

C.SARAVANAN, J.

mac/arb To 1.Deputy State Tax Officer - 2, Thirukazhukundram Assessment Circle, No.42, Wahab Road, Thirukuzhukundram - 603 109.

2.Deputy Commissioner (ST), GST Appeal - Chennai - II, No.1, Greams Road, Chennai - 600 006.

and W.M.P.Nos.27225 and 27226 of 2023 25.09.2023 Page No. 4 of 4