Iyyayiram v. Govt Of Tamil Nadu

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 22.11.2022

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE Ms. JUSTICE P.T. ASHA & C.M.P.Nos.850 & 851 of 2017 1.Iyyayiram 2.Pazhanimurugan 3.Selvamurugan 4.Selvi ... Appellants Vs 1.Govt. Of Tamil Nadu Rep. by District Collector Cuddalore District, Cuddalore.

2.The Tahsildar Panruti, having its office at Taluk Office, Panruti.

1/5

3.Bakkialakshmi 4.Palaniammal 5.The Branch Manager LIC of India Having its office at Kumbakonam Road Panruti 6.Vallinayagi 7.Ramanathan 8.Radhakrishnan 9.Mahalakshmi 10.Jothilakshni 11.Baby @ Rathinambal (Died) 12.Rajalakshmi 13.A.Anbarasu 14.Anbuselvi

...Respondents

2/5

(R11 died, R13 & 14 B/R as LRs of the deceased R11 vide Court order dated 28.10.2022 made in C.M.P.No.6437 of 2018 in S.A.No.58 of 2017).

Prayer: Second Appeal is filed under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure against the Judgement and Decree dated 10.02.2016 passed in A.S.No.21 of 2011 on the file of the Sub Court, Panruti confirming the Judgement and Decree dated 26.09.2011 passed in O.S.No.349 of 2000 before the District Munsif's Court, Panruti. For Appellant :

No Appearance JUDGEMENT On the last occasion, i.e., 18.11.2022, a memo had been filed by the learned counsel for the appellants stating that she had given a change of vakalat and that the appellants had taken back the brief from the learned counsel. Therefore, the Registry was directed to delete the name of the learned counsels and print the name of the 3/5

parties.

2. Today, when the matter is called there is no appearance either in person or through some other counsel on behalf of the appellants. Therefore, the Second Appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution. Consequently, connected Civil Miscellaneous Petitions are closed. No costs.

22.11.2022 kan Index: Yes/No Speaking order/non-speaking order To 1.The Sub Court, Panruti.

2.The District Munsif, Panruti.

4/5

P.T.ASHA, J., kan 22.11.2022 5/5