← Library
Madras High Court/30870/2025dismissed as infructuous

S.Rahima Bee v. The Special District Revenue Officer

2025-10-276 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 27.10.2025 Coram THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMY S.Rahima Bee

...Petitioner

Vs.

1. The Special District Revenue Officer (LA), Chennai Metro Rail Limited, No. 327, 4th Floor Nandanam, Chennai 600 035.

2. The Managing Director, Chennai Metro Rail Limited, No.327, 4th Floor Nandanam, Chennai- 600 035.

(2nd respondent impleaded as per order of this Court dated 27.10.2025 in WMP.No.38818 of 2025)

...Respondents

Prayer:Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondent to consider 1/6

the representation of the petitioner made on 23.09.2024 and 06.11.2024 seeking to ensure fair compensation for the lands acquired from the petitioner within a time frame fixed by this Court. For Petitioner :

Mr.R.Abdul Muban for Mr.J.Brezhnev For Respondents :

Mr.P.Sathish (R1) Additional Government Pleader Mr.Vijay (R2) Standing Counsel ***

O R D E R

This Writ Petition has been filed seeking for a direction to the 1st respondent to consider the representations of the petitioner made on 23.09.2024 and 06.11.2024 seeking fair compensation for the lands acquired from the petitioner within a time frame fixed by this Court.

2. Today, when this matter is taken up for hearing, the learned Additional Government Pleader appearing for the 1st respondent as well as the learned Standing Counsel appearing for the 2nd respondent would submit that with respect to the case of the petitioner, reference was already made to 2/6

the Principal District Court, Chengalpet and compensation was also deposited before the said Court and therefore the request made by the petitioners in the aforesaid representations have been duly addressed.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioner had also accepted the aforesaid contention made by the learned Additional Government Pleader appearing for the 1st respondent as well as learned Standing Counsel appearing for the 2nd respondent.

4. In view of the above, since the request made in the representations of the petitioner have been duly addressed,the relief sought for in this writ petition has become infructuous. Hence, this Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed.

27.10.2025 (2/2) Speaking order / Non-Speaking order Index : Yes / No : Yes / No arr 3/6

To

1. The Special District Revenue Officer (LA), Chennai Metro Rail Limited, No. 327, 4th Floor Nandanam, Chennai 600 035.

2. The Managing Director, Chennai Metro Rail Limited, No.327, 4th Floor Nandanam, Chennai- 600 035.

4/6

KRISHNAN RAMASAMY, J.

arr 5/6

27.10.2025 6/6