S.Sarvathkumar @ Baskar v. The State Rep By

M.DHANDAPANI, J.

The petitioner, who apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offence punishable under Sections 420, 465, 468, 471 and 120(B) of IPC, in Crime No.11 of 2019 on the file of the respondent police, seeks anticipatory bail.

2. The case of the prosecution is that there are totally 5 accused and the petitioner is arrayed as A5. One Chandrasekaran had executed a power of attorney in favour of A2 and A2 had executed sale deed in favour of A3 in respect of the land belonging to the said Chandrasekaran and the petitioner had affixed the signature as witness in the said document. Hence, the complaint.

3.The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is an innocent and he has been falsely implicated in this case. Hence, he prays for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner. 1/3

4. The learned Government Advocate (crl.side) vehemently opposed to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

5. It is seen that this Court had earlier dismissed the anticipatory bail petition filed by the co-accused in Crl.O.P.No.27475 of 2019 on 16.10.2019 and this Court also dismissed the anticipatory bail petition filed by the petitioner in Crl.O.P.No.2358 of 2020, and that there is no chance of circumstances for grant of anticipatory bail. Hence, this Court is not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

6. Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed. 10.11.2022 jd 2/3

M.DHANDAPANI,J.

jd 10.11.2022 3/3