← Library
Madras High CourtCOMP.A/317/2025allowed

M/S.Hindustan Steel Works Construction Ltd., v. The Official Liquidator

2026-03-06Honourable Mr Justice Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy5 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 06-03-2026

CORAM

THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY COMP.A Nos. 317, 318, 319, 320, 321 & 322 of 2025 in C.P.No.295 of 2013 In all Applications M/s.Hindustan Steel Works Construction Ltd., Represented by its Directors, No.167, 3rd Floor, Dr.Annie Besant road, Worli Naka, Mumbai - 400 018.

..Applicant(s) Vs The Official Liquidator High Court, Madras, Liquidator of M/s.SAARG RR Limited, (in provisional liquidation) ..Respondent(s) PRAYER in Comp.A.No.317 of 2025 in C.A.No.542/2017: Judge's summons filed under XIV Rule 8 of Madras High Court Original Side Rules read with Rule 9 and 11(b) of Company (Court) Rules, 1959, praying to reopen evidence in Company Application No.542 of 2017;

PRAYER in Comp.A.No.318 of 2025 in C.A.No.536/2017: Judge's summons filed under XIV Rule 8 of Madras High Court Original Side Rules read with Rule 9 and 11(b) of Company (Court) Rules, 1959, praying to recall the PW1 and to cross-examine the PW1 witness namely S.Visvaninothini (Junior Technical Assistant) in Company Application No.536/2017; PRAYER in Comp.A.No.319 of 2025 in C.A.No.536/2017: Judge's summons filed under XIV Rule 8 of Madras High Court Original Side Rules read with Rule 9 and 11(b) of Company (Court)rules, 1959, praying to reopen evidence in

Company Application No.536 of 2017.

PRAYER in Comp.A.No.320 of 2025 in C.A.No.542/2017: Judge's summons filed under XIV Rule 8 of Madras High Court Original Side Rules read with Rule 9 and 11(b) of Company (Court) Rules, 1959, praying to permit the applicant to let in oral and documentary evidence in support of its defence in Company Application No.542 of 2017;

PRAYER in Comp.A.No.321 of 2025 in C.A.No.536/2017: Judge's summons filed under XIV Rule 8 of Madras High Court Original Side Rules read with Rule 9 and 11(b) of Company (Court) Rules, 1959, praying to permit the applicant to let in oral and documentary evidence in support of its defence in Company Application No.536 of 2017; and PRAYER in Comp.A.No.322 of 2025 in C.A.No.542/2017: Judge's summons filed under XIV Rule 8 of Madras High Court Original Side Rules read with Rule 9 and 11(b) of Company (Court) Rules, 1959, praying to to recall the PW1 and to cross-examine the PW1 witness namely S.Visvaninothini (Junior Technical Assistant) in Company Application No.542 of 2017. In all Applications For Petitioner(s):

Mr.V.K.Thiruvengadam for Mr.R. Aravind For Respondent(s):

Ms.Ambili B. Deputy Official Liquidator

ORDER

By order dated 19.12.2025, the applicant was directed to pay the admitted sum of Rs.1,88,000/- as regards A.No.536 of 2017 and the sum of Rs.14,18,470/- as regards A.No.542 of 2017. At the hearing today, learned counsel for the respondent in A.No.536 and 542 of 2017 has handed over banker's cheque bearing No.054519 dated 08.01.2026 issued by the IDBI Bank

in favour of the Official Liquidator for a sum of Rs.16,07,280/-. Since this sum corresponds to the amounts admitted in relation to the two relevant applications, the condition imposed by this Court has been complied with. Accordingly, the following orders are issued:

(i) C.A.Nos.317, 320 and 322 of 2025 in C.A.No.542 of 2017 to reopen the evidence, permit the applicant to let in oral and documentary evidence and to recall PW1 (S.Viswavinothini, Junior Technical Assistant), are allowed. (ii) C.A.Nos.318, 319 and 321 of 2025 in C.A.No.536 of 2017 to reopen the evidence, permit the applicant to let in oral and documentary evidence and to recall PW1 (S.Viswavinothini, Junior Technical Assistant), are allowed. 06-03-2026 (1/2) KAL To The Official Liquidator High Court, Madras, Liquidator of M/s.SAARG RR Limited, (in provisional liquidation)

SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY, J.

KAL COMP.A Nos. 317, 318, 319, 320, 321 & 322 of 2025 in C.P.No.295 of 2013 06-03-2026 (1⁄2)