K.Palaniappan v. The Inspector Of Police

Crl.O.P.No. 9842 of 2016 P.KALAIYARASAN, J.

The petitioner apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offences punishable under Section 4(1-A), 4(a), 4(e) of TNP Act on the file of the respondent police, in Crime No. not known and seeks anticipatory bail.

2. Heard both sides.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been implicated in this case on the allegation that he was found in possession of Toddy and he has been falsely implicated in this case.

4. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor would submit that the petitioner has been implicated in this case on the allegation that he was found in possession of 2 liters of Toddy and there is no previous case against the petitioner.

5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the nature of the allegation made against the petitioner and the fact that there is no bad antecedent against the petitioner, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner with certain conditions.

P.KALAIYARASAN, J.

6.

Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on his appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate No.I, Salem and on executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that the petitioner shall appear before the respondent police daily at 10.00 a.m until further orders. The petitioner shall comply with the condition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. scrupulously. 7.

The petitioner shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within a period of three weeks from the date on which the order copy made ready, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail stands dismissed. 04.05.2016 bbr/srn Crl.O.P.No.9842 of 2016