S.Elizabeth Mary v. The Tamilnadu Tourism

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 04.04.2019

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.K.SASIDHARAN AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.D. AUDIKESAVALU Writ Appeal No. 67 of 2017 & C.M.P. No. 1137 of 2017 Selvi S. Elizabeth Mary ..Appellant Vs.

1.

Corporation rep. by its Managing Director, Corporation rep. by its General Manager, Corporation rep. by its Manager (Administration), ..Respondents Prayer:

Writ Appeal as against the order 21.11.2016 in W.P. No. 20127 of 2013.

Writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the records relating to the orders of the 3rd respondent dated 19.1.2010 in Letter No.3278/ A2/2009 and order dated 19.7.2011 in K.Dis.Memo No.2692/ A2/2010 and the consequential order of the 2nd respondent dated 27.3.2012 in Memo No.870/ A2/ 2012 and quash the same and consequently direct the respondents to forthwith promote the petitioner as the Accounts Assistant in the respondent Corporation with effect from 5.4.2008 with all other attendant and monetary benefits.

For Appellant ::

Mr.R.Jayaprakash for Mrs.M. Srividhya For Respondents::

Mr.U. Karunakaran

J U D G M E N T

(Judgment of the Court was delivered by K.K. SASIDHARAN,J.) The writ petition in W.P. No. 20127 of 2013 filed by the appellant challenging the order denying her promotion was dismissed by the learned Single Judge by order dated 21 November, 2016. Feeling aggrieved, the appellant has come up with this intra-court appeal.

When this appeal came up for hearing before us on an earlier occasion, we directed the respondents to consider the case of the appellant sympathetically and grant her promotion. Accordingly, the Tamil Nadu Tourism Development Corporation has passed an order dated 28 March, 2019 promoting the appellant from the post of Telephone Operator to the post of Store Keeper. The learned counsel for the appellant contended that the appellant was not given her due promotion. 4.

In view of the order dated 28 March, 2019, we are of the view that there is no need to keep this appeal pending. 5.

It is always open to the appellant to approach the appropriate forum, in case, she is still aggrieved. 6.

The writ appeal is disposed of with the above observation. No costs. Connected C.M.P is closed. nv Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CS III) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar To 1.

The Managing Director, Corporation,

The General Manager, Corporation, The Manager (Administration) Corporation, +1cc to Mrs.M.Srividhya, Advocate, SR.NO.33166 Writ Appeal No. 67 of 2017 Kak(24/05/2019)