A.Arumugam v. E.Sarasu And 7 Others

A.No.5632 of 2022 A.No.5632 of 2022 in C.S.No.162 of 2022 SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY, J.

The first defendant in the suit has filed this application to condone the delay of 37 days in filing the written statement. The plaintiff submits that there is no objection to this application being allowed.

2. Upon examining the affidavit in support of this application and being satisfied that sufficient cause is shown, this application is allowed. Consequently, the Registry is directed to receive the written statement. Learned counsel for the third defendant submits that a similar application for condonation of delay was filed by the third defendant. The Registry is directed to list the said application, if otherwise in order, on the next date of hearing.

3. List the matter on 15.12.2022.

08.12.2022 rna 1/2 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

A.No.5632 of 2022 SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY, J.

rna A.No.5632 of 2022 in C.S.No.162 of 2022 08.12.2022 2/2 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis