A.Sethu Ravanth v. Harmander Singh

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

Dated : 22.11.2019 Coram THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM A. Sethu Ravanth ... Petitioner vs.

1. Harmander Singh, Secretary to Government, Municipal Administration & Water Supply Department, Fort St. George, Chennnai - 600 009.

2. P. Velusamy, The Director of Local Fund Audit, Integrated Finance Department, 4th Floor, Back-side of Veterinary Hospital, Nandanam, Chennai - 600 035.

3. Baskaran. K.

Commissioner of Municipal Administration, Nagar Nirvakkam Office Campus, 9th Floor, No. 753, Santhome High Road, MRC Nagar, Raja Annamalaipuram, Chennai - 600 028.

4. Senthilmurugan. M.

The Corporation Commissioner, Dindugal Municipal Corporation, Dindugal.

... Respondents Contempt petition filed under section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act,1971, to punish the respondent for willfully disobedience the order passed by this Hon'ble Court in W.P.No.10722 of 2019 dated 12.04.2019.

For Petitioner : Ms.V.S.Manimekalai For Respondents : Mr.A.N.Thambidurai Special Government Pleader 1/4

O R D E R

The contempt is filed to punish the respondents for the willful disobedience of the order dated 12.04.2019 passed in W.P.No.10722 of 2019. This Court passed an order is as follows:

"9. Accordingly, respondents 1,3 and 4 are directed to submit the pension proposals and all necessary documents to the competent authority namely the 2nd respondent, enabling the 2nd respondent to consider and pass appropriate orders for settlement of the terminal and retirement benefits to the writ petitioner. The said exercise is to be done by all the respondents within a period of 12 weeks from the date or receipt of a copy of this order."

2. The learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent now made a submission that the order passed by this Court on 12.04.2019 is implemented and the amounts due to the contempt petitioner had already been settled. However, the learned counsel for contempt petitioner raised an objection that some more amount is to be settled in favour of the contempt petitioner.

3. This Court is of an opinion that if there is any calculation error or otherwise, the petitioner is at liberty 2/4

to submit a fresh representation to the authorities concerned and the calculation and other eligibility criteria shall be verified and accordingly a decision may be taken if any application is submitted by the petitioner. With this liberty, the contempt petition stands closed. SD/- ASSISTANT REGISTRAR(COMM.CASES) MP //Certified to be true copy// Dated at Madras this the day of 2019. COURT OFFICER(O.S.) from 25th day of September 2008 the Registry is issuing Certified copies of the Orders/Judgments/Decrees in this format.

NRK/16/12/2019 To

1. The Secretary to Government, Municipal Administration & Water Supply Department, Fort St. George, Chennnai - 600 009.

2. The Director of Local Fund Audit, Integrated Finance Department, 4th Floor, Back-side of Veterinary Hospital, Nandanam, Chennai - 600 035.

3/4

3. The Commissioner of Municipal Administration, Nagar Nirvakkam Office Campus, 9th Floor, No. 753, Santhome High Road, MRC Nagar, Raja Annamalaipuram, Chennai - 600 028.

4. The Corporation Commissioner, Dindugal Municipal Corporation, Dindugal.

4/4