← Library
Madras High CourtWP/10985/2017disposed of

M/S.Eaton Power Quality v. The Superintendent Of Police

2023-07-25Honourable Mr Justice M.Dhandapani4 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 25.07.2023 CORAM :

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M. DHANDAPANI W.P.No.10985 of 2017 and WMP.11955 of 2017 and 18231 & 18232 of 2017 M/s.Eaton Power Quality Pvt. Ltd., No.2 EVR Street, Sedarapet, Villianur Commune, Puducherry-605111, Rep by its General Manager-HR/Authorised Signatory. ... Petitioner Vs.

1. The Superintendent of Police, Puducherry.

2. The Inspector of Police, Sedarapet Police Station, Puducherry-605 111.

3. The Labour Officer-Conciliation, No.15, I Floor, Nehru Nagar, Puducherry- 605 011.

4. Cooper Bussmann Workers Union, Rep by its Secretary,Vanur Taluk, Villupuram District-604 102.

5. Cooper Bussmann Thozhilalargal Sangam, Rep.by its Secretary, Vanur Taluk, Villupuram District-604 304, Rep by its Secretary.

... Respondents 1/4

Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents 1 and 2 to provide adequate police protection for the safety security and protection to the lives and property of the petitioners factory Management officials staffs and other workers from the illegal acts of the delinquent workers their henchmen supporters.

For Petitioner :

Mr.R.Prabhakaran - No appearance For Respondents :

Mr.A.Tamilvanan RR1 to 3 Mr.P.R.Thiruneelakandan R4 Mr.S.Veerababu R5

ORDER

The petition has been filed seeking a direction directing the respondents 1 and 2 to provide adequate police protection for the safety security and protection to the lives and property of the petitioners factory Management officials staffs and other workers from the illegal acts of the delinquent workers their henchmen supporters.

2. The learned counsel for the respondent Union submitted that the petitioner has filed a writ petition as if the workman prevented the petitioner for their day to day activities and creating nuisance, causing drop in production level. The respondent union have no intention to do any illegal 2/4

activities as alleged by the petitioner Management. If they have any grievance, they will follow the procedure contemplated under the Industrial Disputes Act.

3. Recording the submission made by the learned counsel for the respondent Union, the writ petition is disposed of. No order as to costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. 20.07.2023 rli Index : Yes / No Speaking order / Non speaking order Netrual Citation Case : Yes / No To

1. The Superintendent of Police, Puducherry.

2. The Inspector of Police, Sedarapet Police Station, Puducherry-605 111.

3. The Labour Officer-Conciliation, No.15, I Floor, Nehru Nagar, Puducherry- 605 011.

3/4

M.DHANDAPANI, J.

rli W.P.No.10985 of 2017 25.07.2023 4/4