← Library
Madras High CourtWP/30237/2024withdrawn dismissed

K.Palpandi v. The Metropolitan Transport Corporation (Chennai)Ltd

2024-10-15Honourable Ms Justice R.N.Manjula4 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 15.10.2024

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MS.JUSTICE R.N.MANJULA K.Palpandi ... Petitioner Vs.

1.The Metropolitan Transport Corporation (Chennai) Ltd., Rep by its Managing Director, Pallavan House, Anna Salai, Chennai 600 002.

2.The Management, Metropolitan Transport Corporation (Chennai) Ltd., Rep by its Senior Deputy Manager (HRD), Pallavan House, Anna Salai, Chennai 600 002.

3.The Special Joint Commissioner of Labour, Labour Commissioner Office, DMS Complex, Teynampet, Chennai 600 006.

... Respondents Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records relating to the order dated 29.09.2020 passed by the 2nd respondent made in his proceedings order No.3239/sabi/[O-No-9]/MTC/2020 and which was confirmed by the third respondent's order dated 21.01.2022 made in its Page No.1 of 4

approval petition A.P.No.164 of 2020 and quash the same as illegal, against law and without following the principles of natural justice and consequently direct the respondents 1 and 2 to reinstate the petitioner's service forthwith and to calculate the service benefits of the petitioner from the date 29.09.2020 onwards and to disburse the same to the petitioner.

For Petitioner : Mr.K.Senthil Kumar For Respondents : Mrs.M.Jayanthi, AGP for R3 Mr.Vinothraj, Standing Counsel for R1 & R2

ORDER

This Writ Petition has been filed to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records of the order of the 2nd respondent dated 29.09.2020 in its proceedings No.3239/sabi/[O-No]9/MTC/2020, which was confirmed by the order of the 3rd respondent dated 21.01.2022 made in its approval petition A.P.No.164 of 2020 and quash the same as illegal and consequently, direct the respondents 1 and 2 to reinstate the petitioner and to calculate the service benefits of the petitioner from 29.09.2020 and to disburse the same to the petitioner. Page No.2 of 4

2. When the matter was taken up, the learned counsel for the petitioner sought permission of this Court to withdraw this Writ Petition and he has also made an endorsement to that effect.

3. In view of the above submission and the endorsement made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner is permitted to withdraw this Writ Petition. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs.

Index : Yes /No 15.10.2024 Speaking / Non-speaking gsk Page No.3 of 4

R.N.MANJULA , J.

gsk To 1.The Managing Director, The Metropolitan Transport Corporation (Chennai) Ltd., Pallavan House, Anna Salai, Chennai 600 002.

2.The Senior Deputy Manager (HRD), The Management, Metropolitan Transport Corporation (Chennai) Ltd., Pallavan House, Anna Salai, Chennai 600 002.

3.The Special Joint Commissioner of Labour, Labour Commissioner Office, DMS Complex, Teynampet, Chennai 600 006.

15.10.2024 Page No.4 of 4