Anburose v. The State Rep By Its,

A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA , J.

The petitioner who apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offence punishable under Sections 420, 451, 294(b), 323 and 506(i) of IPC in Crime No.322 of 2022, seeks anticipatory bail.

2. The case of the prosecution is that on account of dispute regarding selling of property, the petitioner along with other accused had abused the defacto complainant and assaulted him with iron rod. Hence, the complaint.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner is an innocent person and due to previous enmity, a false complaint has been foisted against him. He would further submit that the arrested accused in this case has already been enlarged on bail. Hence, he prays for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

4.The learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the respondent would submit that on account of dispute regarding selling of property, the petitioner along with other accused had abused the defacto complainant and assaulted him with iron rod. He would further submit that the injured has been discharged from the hospital and the arrested accused in this case has been enlarged on bail. Thereby, he vehemently opposed for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner. 5.Taking into consideration the facts of the case and the submissions made by the learned counsel and also taking note of the fact that the injured has been discharged from the hospital, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner with certain conditions. 6.

Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on his appearance, within a period of fifteen days from the date on which the order copy made ready, before the learned Judicial Magistrate No.II, Thiruvallur on condition that the petitioner shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.

Thousand only) with two sureties for a like sum to the satisfaction of the respondent police or the police officer, who intends to arrest or to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail shall stand dismissed and on further condition that:

[a] the petitioner and the sureties shall affix their photographs and Left Thumb Impression in the surety bond and the Magistrate may obtain a copy of their Aadhar card or Bank pass Book to ensure their identity.

[b] the petitioner shall report before the respondent Police daily at 10.30 a.m., for a period of two weeks and thereafter, every Saturday at 10.30 a.m., until further orders.

[c] the petitioner shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial; [d] the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial;

[e] On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is

entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560];

[f] If the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 229A IPC;

04.11.2022 vkr A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA , J.

vkr 04.11.2022