← Library
Madras High CourtWP/1370/2004dismissed as infructuous

K.Lakshminarayana Reddiar v. 1.Govt., Of Tn Rep.By Secy.,

2017-07-17Honourable Mr Justice M.Dhandapani3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 17.07.2017

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI W.P.No.1370 of 2004 K.Lakshminarayana Reddiar ... Petitioner in both Wps.

Vs.

1. Government of TamilNadu represented by Secretary Rural Development Department Fort St.George, Chennai 600 009.

2. The Director of Rural Development Panagal Building Saidapet, Chennai 15.

3. The Inspector of Panchayat

4. Geetha Anand

5. Ganapathy

6. Shanthi

7. Senthilkumaran

8. Ettiyan

9. Panneer

10. K.Jayalakshmi Member, Kanai Panchayat, (Impleaded as per order of the Court dated 03.08.2004 in WPMP. No.10475 of 2004.

... Respondents in W.P.No.1370 of 2004.

1. The Inspector of Panchayat

2. The Tahsildar, Villupuram.

... Respondents in W.P.No.2604 of 2004.

Prayer in W.P.No.1370 of 2004:

Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Certiorari to call for the records of the third respondent in Na.Ka.A4/4841/2002 dated 21.01.2004 and quash the same.

Prayer in W.P.No.2604 of 2004:

Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records of the second respondent in Na.Ka.A6/1052/2004 dated 06.02.2004 to quash the same and direct the respondents to forbear from convening a meeting of Kanai Panchayat for consideration of the proposal to remove the petitioner as president of the panchayat on the basis of charges set forth therein.

For Petitioner : Mr.R.Yashod Vardhan sue for Mr.R.Sunil Kumar.

For Respondents : Mr.M.Digvijaypandiyan for R1 to R3, Additional Government Pleader, in W.P.No.1370 of 2004.

Mr.M.Digvijaypandiyan, Additional Government Pleader, in W.P.No.2604 of 2004.

COMMON ORDER The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submit that the relief sought for in the writ petitions has become infructuous and hence the writ petitions may be dismissed as infructuous. He has also made an endorsement to that effect in the petition.

2. Recording the endorsement made by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, the writ petitions are dismissed as infructuous. No costs. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CS III) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar msvm To

1. The Secretary, Government of TamilNadu, Rural Development Department Fort St.George, Chennai 600 009.

2. The Director of Rural Development Panagal Building Saidapet, Chennai 15.

3. The Inspector of Panchayat

4. The Tahsildar, Villupuram.

+1cc to the Government Pleader, S.R.No.50147 W.P.Nos.1370 and 2604 of 2004 RSI(CO) CS/17/08/17