A.Govindarasu v. The District Collector

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 08.03.2019

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN W.P.No.21642 of 2017 A.Govindarasu ... Petitioner Vs.

1. The District Collector, Cuddalore District, Cuddalore.

2. The Inspector of Police, Mantharakuppam Police Station, Cuddalore District.

... Respondents PRAYER: Writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents herein particularly the 1st respondent herein viz., the District Collector, Cuddalore District by directing the 2nd respondent herein viz., the Inspector of Police, Mantharakuppam Police Station, Cuddalore District to adequate protection to the petitioner herein for reconstruction of Dome at the same place.

For Petitioner :

Mr.K.Balakrishnan For Respondents :

Mr.M.Mohammed Riyaz Additional Public Prosecutor

O R D E R

The writ petition has been filed to direct the second respondent to provide adequate protection to the petitioner herein for reconstruction of Dome at the same place.

2. Now, almost two years have been lapsed and hence, due to the lapse of period, the prayer sought for by the petitioner cannot be granted now. However, the petitioner is at liberty to file a fresh petition, on fresh cause of action, if so advised. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

3. With the above observations, this Writ Petition stands disposed of. No costs.

Sd/- Deputy Registrar (CJ Conf) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar jas/rts To

1. The District Collector, Cuddalore District, Cuddalore.

2. The Inspector of Police, Mantharakuppam Police Station, Cuddalore District.

3. The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras.

W.P.No.21642 of 2017 AD(CO) SSM(18/06/2019) https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/