M.Vignesh v. State Rep By
A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA, J.
The petitioner, who apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under Sections 294(b), 324 and 506(ii) of IPC in Crime No.496 of 2022, seeks anticipatory bail.
2. The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner and the defacto complainant are friends and due to a wordy quarrel that took place in the sea shore, the petitioner along with his friends had abused and assaulted the defacto complainant with knife. Hence, the complaint. 3.The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner is an innocent person and due to previous enmity, a false complaint has been given against him. He would further submit that it is a case and case in counter in Crime No.495 of 2022. Hence, he prays for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner.
4.The learned Government Advocate (Crl.side) appearing for the respondent Police would submit that the petitioner and the defacto complainant are friends. Due to a wordy quarrel that took place in the sea shore, the petitioner along with his friends abused the defacto complainant and also assaulted him with knife. He would further submit that the injured has taken treatment as out patient in the hospital. Hence, he opposed for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner. 5.Heard the learned counsel and perused the entire materials available on record.
6.Taking into consideration the facts and circumstances of the case and the submissions made by the learned counsel and also of the fact that the injured has taken treatment as out patient in the hospital, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner with certain conditions.
7.Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on his appearance, within a period of fifteen days from the date on which the order copy made ready, before the learned IX Metropolitan Magistrate, Saidapet, on condition that the petitioner shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the respondent police or the police officer who intends to arrest or to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail shall stand dismissed and on further condition that:
[a] the petitioner and the sureties shall affix their photographs and Left Thumb Impression in the surety bond and the Magistrate may obtain a copy of their Aadhar card or Bank pass Book to ensure their identity.
[b] the petitioner shall report before the respondent police everyday at 10.30 a.m., for a period of four weeks and thereafter, every Saturday at 10.30 a.m., until further orders. [c] the petitioner shall not tamper with evidence or witness either
during investigation or trial.
[d] the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial.
[e] On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560].
[f] If the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 229A IPC.
11.11.2022 vkr
A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA, J.
vkr 11.11.2022