G.Veerasamy, v. The District Collector,

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 14.12.2016

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE T.RAJA W.P.No.42759 of 2016 G.Veerasamy

...Petitioner

-vs1. The District Collector Cuddalore District Cuddalore

2. Manisamy S/o Palanisamy

...Respondents

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for the issue of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the first respondent to take action in pursuance of the Audit Objection raised in B.2.Aa3/1389/2014 dated 27.08.2016 against the second respondent and thereby dispose of the representation of the petitioner dated 04.10.2016, 07.10.2016 and 7.11.2016. For Petitioner : Mr.A.Jayachandran For Respondents :

Mr.M.Elumalai Government Advocate for R1

ORDER

Learned counsel for the petitioner sought to withdraw the writ petition and he has also made an endorsement to that effect.

Accordingly, recording his statement and the endorsement, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

To

1. The District Collector Cuddalore District Cuddalore +1cc to Mr.Nixon, Advocate, S.R.No. 73210 +1cc to the Government Pleader, S.R.No.73305 CNR(CO) RS(19/01/2017) W.P.No.42759 of 2016 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/