Sangeetha v. State Rep By

Crl.O.P.No.27229 of 2022 Crl.O.P.No.27229 of 2022 A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA , J.

The petitioner who apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under Sections 4(1)(a), 4(1A)(ii) of TNP Act in Crime No.96 of 2022, seeks anticipatory bail. 2.The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner was found in illegal possession of 5 litres of ID arrack. Hence, the complaint. 3.The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner is an innocent person and she has been falsely implicated in this case. Hence, he prays for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner. 4.Per contra, the learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) would submit that the petitioner is a habitual offender against whom there is one previous case similar in nature pending against her. Hence, he vehemently opposed for the grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner. A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA , J.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

Crl.O.P.No.27229 of 2022 vkr 5.Taking into account the nature of offence and the previous antecedents of the petitioner, this Court is not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed.

17.11.2022 vkr Crl.O.P.No.27229 of 2022 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis