← Library
Madras High CourtWP/42851/2016disposed of

G.Sundararajan v. The Director General Of Police

2016-12-08Honourable Mr Justice R. Mahadevan3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 08.12.2016

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.MAHADEVAN W.P.No.42851 of 2016 G.Sundararajan [ Petitioner ] Vs 1.The Director General of Police, Police Headquarters, Kamarajar Salai, Mylapore, Chennai-600 004.

2.The Superintendent of Police, SP Office Campus, Sathuvacharry, Vellore District.

3.The Inspector of Police, Gudiyatham Taluk Police Station, Gudiyatham, Vellore District.

[Respondents] Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents to remove the petitioner's name displayed in H.S.No.270 from the History Sheet Book maintained by the third respondent by considering the petitioner's representation dated 17.10.2015.

For Petitioner : Mr.D.Thirumoorthy For Respondents : Mr.C.Emalias, Additional Public Prosecutor

O R D E R

This writ petition has been filed for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents to remove the petitioner's name displayed in H.S.No.270 from the History Sheet Book maintained by the third respondent by considering the petitioner's representation dated 17.10.2015. 2.It is the specific claim of the petitioner that his name has been unnecessarily included in the History Sheet maintained by the third respondent, when all the cases levelled against the petitioner, except one, ended in acquittal.

3.The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that if the representation of the petitioner is considered by the respondents, the petitioner would be satisfied. 4.Considering the limited prayer sought for by the petitioner and the fact that the petitioner was acquitted in all the cases levelled against him, except one, the claim of the petitioner could be considered by the authorities and necessary orders be passed.

5.The petitioner has unnecessarily impleaded the first and second respondents, since the third respondent alone has to consider the prayer of the petitioner. Hence this writ petition is dismissed as against the first and second respondents. 6.Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of directing the third respondent to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 17.10.2015 on merits and in accordance with law and pass appropriate orders, within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. No costs. sd/- Assistant Register //True Copy // Sub Assistant Register KM

To 1.The Director General of Police, Police Headquarters, Kamarajar Salai, Mylapore, Chennai-600 004.

2.The Superintendent of Police, SP Office Campus, Sathuvacharry, Vellore District.

3.The Inspector of Police, Gudiyatham Taluk Police Station, Gudiyatham, Vellore District.

+1 cc to Mrs.S.P.Arthi, Advocate sr.72454 W.P.No.42851 of 2016 SVI[CO] VS 30/12/2016