Vennila v. The State Rep By, Sub Inspector Of Police,

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 12.08.2025

CORAM:

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN in Crl.R.C.No.1385 of 2025

1. Vennila

2. Kavitha

3. Sathya

...Petitioners

Vs.

The State Rep By Sub-Inspector of Police, Dharmapuri Railway Police Station ... Respondent PRAYER: Criminal Miscellaneous Petition filed under Section 438 r/w 442 of BNSS, to suspend the sentence imposed on the petitioner in Crl.A.No.41 of 2023 vide order dated 23.06.2025 on the file of the learned Principal District Court, Dharmapuri by confirming the Judgment made in C.C.No.422 of 2022 dated 26.09.2023 on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate No.I, Dharmapuri and enlarge the petitioner on bail pending disposal of the above Criminal Revision. For Petitioners : Mr.J.Bharathi Raja For Respondent : Mr.A.Gopinath Government Advocate (Crl.Side)

ORDER

This Criminal Miscellaneous Petition has been filed by the petitioner, seeking suspension of sentence imposed on the petitioner in Crl.A.No.41 of 2023 vide order dated 23.06.2025 on the file of the learned Principal District Court, Dharmapuri by confirming the Judgment made in C.C.No.422 of 2022 dated 26.09.2023 on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate No.I, Dharmapuri and enlarge the petitioner on bail pending disposal of the above Criminal Revision. 2.

The petitioner, who is an accused in C.C.No.422 of 2022 was convicted and sentenced by the earned Judicial Magistrate No.I, Dharmapuri, vide judgment dated 26.09.2023, as follows: Rank of the accused Conviction under Section Sentence awarded A.1 Section 379 of IPC to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of 3 years Aggrieved over the same, the petitioner has preferred Criminal Appeal in Crl.A.No.41 of 2023 and the learned Principal Sessions Judge, Dharmapuri, by judgment dated 23.06.2025 confirmed the order passed by the court below.

3.

Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned

Government Advocate (Crl.Side) for the respondent. 4.

This Court finds no reasons to suspend the sentence since the Trial Court and the Appellate Court has gone through the evidence in its entirety and also finds that the petitioner had committed very serious offence as against the society.

5.

In the result, the petition for suspension of sentence is dismissed.

The respondent is directed to secure the petitioner. 12.08.2025 (2/2) Index : Yes/No : Yes/No Speaking/non-speaking order ssd

To

1. The Principal Sessions Judge, Dharmapuri

2. The Judicial Magistrate No.I, Dharmapuri 3.The State Rep By Sub-Inspector of Police, Dharmapuri Railway Police Station 4.The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras, Chennai.

G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN, J.

ssd 12.08.2025 (2/2)