M/S.Shri Siddhivinayak v. The Commissioner Of Customs,

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED :22.12.2016

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER Writ Petition No.44025 of 2016 and W.M.P.Nos.37832 and 37833 of 2016 M/s.Shri Siddhivinayak Technologies Pvt.Ltd. [Petitioner] Rep. by its Director Shri.Ashutosh Sharma A-18 Sector 67 Gautham Budi Nagar Noida 201 301 Uttar Pradesh.

Vs The Commissioner of Customs Chennai II Commissionerate Custom House 60 Rajaji Salai Chennai-600 001.

[Respondent] Writ petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for a Writ of Certiorarified mandamus Calling for the records pertaining to impugned proceedings of the respondent in order-inoriginal No.50231/2016 dated 23.09.2016 and quashing the same and direct the respondent to release the goods of the petitioner.

For Petitioner :

Mr.G.Derrick Sam For Respondent :

Mr.K.Ravi

ORDER

1. After arguments, learned counsel for the petitioner says that he wants to withdraw the writ petition, with liberty to file an appeal before the Tribunal.

2. Petition is dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty to approach the Tribunal. The petitioner is granted leave to raise all the grounds, which have been raised in the https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

writ petition. There shall be no order as to costs. Resultantly, the connected Miscellaneous Petitions stand closed.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar rg To The Commissioner of Customs Chennai II Commissionerate Custom House 60 Rajaji Salai Chennai-600 001.

+1cc to Mr.K. Ravi, Advocate, S.R.No.74893 ug(CO) rs(09/01/2017) W.P.No.44025 of 2016 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/