← Library
Madras High CourtWP/29236/2019dismissed

V.Murugesan v. The Tahsildar

2019-10-14Honourable Dr Justice G. Jayachandran2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

Dated:14.10.2019 Coram:

THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE G.JAYACHANDRAN Writ Petition Nos.29236 and 29239 of 2019 V.Murugesan .. Petitioner in W.P.No.29236/2019 V.Sundaram .. Petitioner in W.P.No.29239/2019 /versus/ 1.The Tahsildar, Madukarai Taluk Office, Madukarai, Coimbatore.

2.Duraisamy 3.Palanisamy .. Respondents in both cases Common Prayer: Writ Petitions filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the 1st respondent to consider and pass orders on the petitioner's objection dated 28.09.2019 prior to including the names of respondents 2 and 3 in patta No.1812 and 1813 issued by the 1st respondent.

For Petitioners :Mr.B.Nambiselvan (in both cases) For Respondents :Mr.J.Purushothaman, GA (in both cases) for R1 COMMON ORDER By consent, these writ petitions are taken up for final disposal at the admission stage itself. 2.The Prayer in these writ petitions is to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the 1st respondent to consider and pass orders on the petitioner's objection dated 28.09.2019 prior to including the names of respondents 2 and 3 in patta No.1812 and 1813 issued by the 1st respondent.

3.The apprehension of the petitioners is that some https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

third party has given representation to give patta for the land bearing S.Nos.227/1C, 227/1E, 228/8, 228/9, 229/1, 230/1A2B, 230/1A3A, 250/1A totally to an extent of 2.75.50 Hectare, situated at Seerapalayam Village, Madukarai Taluk, Coimbatore, which according to the petitioners, owned by them. The petitioners have also given objection to the 1st respondent on 28.09.2019. While so, without any cause of action, they have rushed to this Court by filing these writ petitions alleging that without giving opportunity, the first respondent is trying to mutate the records in favour of respondents 2 and 3. 4.This Court finds that the apprehension of the petitioners is baseless.

5.The learned Government Advocate, who takes notice for the first respondent assures that no order will be passed without giving opportunity to the petitioners. 6.Recording the same, these writ petitions are dismissed. No costs.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar (CJ Conf) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar ari To:

The Tahsildar, Madukarai Taluk Office, Madukarai, Coimbatore.

+1cc to Mr.B.Nambiselvan, Advocate, S.R.No. 85864 W.P.Nos.29236 & 29239 of 2019 BS(CO) GN(05/11/2019) https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/