← Library
Madras High CourtREV.APLW/160/2023closed

S.Sathyaseelan v. The District Collector

2025-08-22Honourable Mr Justice N. Sathish Kumar4 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 22.08.2025

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N.SATHISH KUMAR Rev.Appl.No.160 of 2023 S.Sathyaseelan .. Petitioner

Versus

1.The District Collector Perambalur District Perambalur - 621 101 2.The Special Tahsildar Adi Dravidar Welfare Perambalur - 621 101 3.The Government of Tamil Nadu Rep by its Secretary to Social Welfare Department Fort St.George, Chennai - 600 009 .. Respondents Cont.P.No.2892 of 2023 S.Sathyaseelan ... Petitioner Vs.

K.Karpagam, I.A.S., The District Collector Perambalur District Perambalur ... Respondent Rev.Appl.No.160 of 2023: Petition is filed under Section 114 of the Civil Procedure Code r/w Order 47 Rule 1 to review the order of this Court dated 27.07.2023 passed in W.P.No.22060 of 2023.

Cont.P.No.2892 of 2023: Petition filed under Section 11 of Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 to punish the respondent for wilful disobedience of the order of this Court dated 27.07.2023 passed in WP.No.22060 of 2023. 1/4

Rev.Appl.No.160 of 2023 For Petitioner :

Mr.N.Subramaniyan For Respondents :

Mr.P.Kumaresan, AAG assisted by Mr.N.Naveenkumar, GA Cont.P.No.2892 of 2023 For Petitioner :

Mr.N.Subramaniyan For Respondent :

Mr.P.Kumaresan, AAG assisted by Mr.N.Naveenkumar, GA COMMON ORDER Review has been filed to review the order of this Court dated 27.07.2023 passed in W.P.No.22060 of 2023.

Contempt petition has been filed to punish the respondent for wilful disobedience of the order of this Court dated 27.07.2023 passed in WP.No.22060 of 2023

2. The main contention of the review petitioner is that this Court while setting aside the order of termination dated 31.10.2022 directed the first respondent to reinstate the petitioner forthwith with continuity of service. According to him, though the order has been complied, continuity of service has not been granted from the order of termination. Hence, the review. 2/4

3. The learned Additional Advocate General submitted that earlier though it is stated that the petitioner is temporarily obsorbed, later same has been corrected by the proceedings in Na.Ka.No.I1/9466/2022 dated 06.08.2025 and continuity of service has been restored. The learned AAG fairly submitted that even from the date of termination, i.e., 31.10.2022, the petitioner is entitled to all the service benefits. Such statement is recorded.

4. Such view of the matter, the respondents having given the continuity of service in Na.Ka.No.I1/9466/2022 dated 06.08.2025 is directed to pay all the service benefits from 01.11.2022. Therefore, nothing survives for adjudication in this review and both the review as well as the contempt petition stands closed.

22.08.2025 Index : Yes/No Internet : Yes/No dhk To 1.The District Collector Perambalur District Perambalur - 621 101 2.The Special Tahsildar Adi Dravidar Welfare Perambalur - 621 101 3/4

N.SATHISH KUMAR, J.

dhk 3.The Secretary to Social Welfare Department The Government of Tamil Nadu Fort St.George, Chennai - 600 009 22.08.2025 4/4